Open access papers are cited more frequently than subscription-based articles, according to a study published this week in PLoS Biology, an open access journal. However, these findings alone may not persuade more authors to consider open access publishing, experts said.This report "tends to confirm what many people suspected would be the case," said Kenneth R. Fulton, executive director of the National Academy of Science and publisher of Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. But how widely applicable these findings are, and whether they will induce authors to consider open access publishing is unknown, he added. For instance, a survey released last week by the Publishing Research Consortium suggests that access to articles is not a major problem for researchers. Specifically, the survey found that scientists ranked greater access to the literature 12th out of 16 on a list of possible ways to improve research productivity.Previous research...
PNASGunther EysenbachJournal of Medical Internet Research, PNAS non-open access paperPNAS Nature Publishing GroupThe ScientistNature always considering our optionsPNASThe Scientist latest firstname.lastname@example.orgThe Scientisthttp://www.the-scientist.com/news/20051011/02/PLoS Biologyhttp://www.plosbiology.orghttp://www.pnas.orgPublishing Research Consortiumhttp://www.publishingresearch.org.uk/prcweb/PRCWeb.nsf/0/3DF67165EB1FCA078025716B0048ADB8!opendocumenthttp://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.htmlhttp://yi.com/home/EysenbachGunther/http://www.jmir.orgPNASPM_ID 15331778http://www.nature.com/index.htmlThe Scientisthttp://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23426/Journal of Medical Internet Researchhttp://www.jmir.org/2006/2/e8/
Interested in reading more?
Become a Member of
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!