Editorial (old)

Many ask, but few answer. We present two of science's most intriguing theories.

Amateurs have the freedom to experiment and innovate – watch out for their impact.

Here's how microorganisms may be the power plants of the future.

US healthcare needs radical revision, but we can't wipe out innovation in the process.

Without ideological struggles that test our values and beliefs, how can we know what is "truth"?

Is there something in our cultural heritage that makes us better or worse at biotech?

The central tenets of science enhance communication and our influence on society.

The call for a presidential science debate went unheeded, but it was worthwhile.

What the industry can learn from the $2,500 'Nano' car.

Why science can save the future - not just the people - of these impoverished nations.

The Scientist Community is about to take off. We hope you'll join us.

Even when the source of your salary is the government, it's not a guarantee.

Most life scientists are working at an enormous disadvantage, and their resentment is growing.

Having failed the developing world, are we now getting it right?

Model behavior on a model organism.

Here's how The Scientist will take action to support women in science.

How to get students to go into science.

How far has open access come in a decade? And where will it go in the next?

Should researchers "frame" their work, or is that just spin?

Our readers seem divided, or at least concerned, over this academic institution's future.