Ex-NIEHS director speaks out

Written byBob Grant

| 2 min read

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) director David Schwartz, who officially linkurl:resigned;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54296/ from the agency last Friday, told __The Scientist__ that NIEHS "could do better" and will "be more successful" under new leadership. Schwartz also said that the environmental health community misunderstood his goals as director of NIEHS. "There was a belief that I was creating a clinical institute," he said, "when I had no intention of creating a clinical institute." Schwartz was criticized by legislators, and scientists both inside and outside NIEHS for steering the agency away from its traditional focus on research into the prevention of environmentally mediated disease and towards more clinical aspects of these diseases. "We wanted to attract more physician/scientists to the institute," Schwartz said. "For some reason, that was misinterpreted as funding only physician/scientists." "I was also promoting the idea that environmental science had a unique opportunity to use exposures to uniquely understand the etiology, mechanisms, and factors that are associated with the progression of disease," Schwartz continued. Schwartz also defended his decision in 2005 to suggest privatizing NIEHS's flagship journal, __Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP)__, a proposition that raised the ire of the environmental health community. He said that exploring privatization was just part of his institute-wide search for ways to trim the institute's budget. "__Environmental Health Perspectives__ was one of our expenditures that I thought was important to look at carefully," Schwartz said. Schwartz eventually wrote against privatizing __EHP__ in an linkurl:editorial;https://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/114-8/director.html that was published in the journal's August 2006 issue. In response to linkurl:allegations;https://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/53502/ of misconduct - for example, trading on his status as NIEHS director by testifying as an expert witness in asbestos court cases and diverting resources away from NIEHS researchers to fund his own lab - Schwartz said that any rule breaking he did was out of ignorance. "I thought I was acting within the bounds of what I had received permission to do," he said. "If there were things I did that exceeded those bounds, it was because I didn't understand that or people around me didn't understand that." Schwartz also said that he was stung when almost 100 NIEHS researchers held a linkurl:secret ballot;https://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/53502/ to express their opposition to his leadership and their view that Schwartz had damaged morale at the institute. "Obviously, I was personally disappointed," he said. When asked if he had any regrets concerning his turbulent tenure as NIEHS director, Schwartz said: "Of course I would have done things differently, but hindsight is always 20/20." "I believed, and I still believe, I had the best intentions for the institute in terms of the efforts I put into my position and the leadership I provided." CORRECTION (Feb. 12, 2007): When originally posted, this article contained a misspelling in one of David Schwartz's quotes. __The Scientist__ regrets the error.

Meet the Author

Bob Grant

From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer. Before joining the team, he worked as a reporter at Audubon and earned a master’s degree in science journalism from New York University. In his previous life, he pursued a career in science, getting a bachelor’s degree in wildlife biology from Montana State University and a master’s degree in marine biology from the College of Charleston in South Carolina. Bob edited Reading Frames and other sections of the magazine.

View Full Profile

Ex-NIEHS director speaks out

The Scientist ARCHIVES

Become a Member of

Meet the Author

Bob Grant

Related Research Resources

Multiplex Microscopy Becomes Easier with Encoded Antibodies

Research Resources

Podcasts

Webinars

Videos

Infographics

eBooks

Essential Genes Are Dominantly Activated by Single Transcription Factors

Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Engineering CAR-Neutrophils In Vivo to Target Glioblastoma

Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Products

Product News

The ASSIST PLUS pipetting robot for affordable workflow automation

Rapidly isolate primary cells and make uniform single-cell suspensions with Corning® Cell Strainers

CellBrite® Steady Membrane Stain: Cell surface staining built for real-time imaging

Monod Bio Licenses AI-designed Protein Technologies to SignalChem Biotech for Custom Discovery Assays