Early in April, The Scientist called on researchers and science enthusiasts to submit their video and website creations for our second annual Labby Multimedia Awards—or Labbies. The entries had to be created with funding from a single research grant and had to relate to the life sciences. From dozens of submissions, we selected five video and website finalists. The winners were then chosen by a panel of judges as well as hundreds of readers voting at the-scientist.com. For tips on creating science videos and websites, see our September 2011 feature "Showcase Your Science."
VIDEO WINNERS
Judges' Choice: Tiny Snow Makers
By Julia Sable and David Sands
“If you look into the core of a raindrop or snowflake, what are you likely to find? Bacteria!” writes science filmmaker Julia Sable, who directed this five-minute clip describing how bacteria in atmospheric clouds can help make snow. Water...
Sanford: The question/answer format promotes inquiry and multiple interviews, while short sound bites keep the tempo fresh and lively.Holmes: Terrific, what fun!
Readers' Choice: The Weaver Ant
By Melissa Wells and Mark W. Moffett
In this five-minute video, entomologist, photographer, and author of Adventures Among Ants, Mark “Dr. Bugs” Moffett, tromps through the Cambodian jungle in search of weaver ants, which, despite their powerful sting, are a local snack. Although Moffett is mainly interested in documenting the eusocial behavior of the ants, he also hopes to transmit a sense of how much fun it is to be a scientist. “Life is about storytelling,” he says. “I use what I learn in my research to tell science stories.”
Kirby: Something that always makes for a good video is a charismatic presenter. Mark’s attempts to get tourists to eat the ants became a bit repetitive, though.Sanford: A good mix of information and entertainment.
VIDEO RUNNERS UP
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Kirby: Hypnotic and psychedelic. It shows that art can create scientific meaning. But it gets a bit repetitive across 7.5 minutes. | Sanford: I loved the juxtaposition of the scientists’ thoughts on happy cells and the images. Although I don’t think I’m any closer to being able to identify a happy cell myself. | Kirby: The visualization of the proteins matched well with the narration. The video could have benefitted from music in the main body and not just the credit sequence. |
WEBSITE WINNERS
Judges' Choice: The Brain Observatory
By Jacopo Annese, Lloyd Nicks, and Colleen Sheh
Jacopo Annese, creator and director of The Brain Observatory, envisioned the website as “the brain’s Hubble telescope.” Through photographs, videos, and live-streaming feeds of daily lab activities, the site provides unprecedented views of brains and ongoing research with the goal of mapping brain structures to diagnose disease and target treatment. “You won’t find stock photography here, least of all fake researchers in immaculate lab coats smiling vacuously at a urine sample in a test tube,” he says.
Kirby: The production qualities for this web site are amazing. Navigation was easy and links were usefully tagged. It is hard to say a web page about a brain tumor could be fun, but I enjoyed looking at all the different categories on the site.Sanford: The visual aspects of this site are eye candy that highlight the brain as a very appealing organ to investigate.
Readers' Choice: The Cell: An Image Library
By David Orloff, Janet Iwasa, John Hufnagle, Ryan Schenk, John Murray, Joan Goldberg,and Caroline Kane
Created by the American Society for Cell Biology, this catalog of images, animations, and videos depicts myriad cell images and live-action cellular processes. By making its contents open access, the creators hope to “advance research and education on cellular activity, with the ultimate goal of improving human health,” says David Orloff, manager of the Image Library. “As far as I know, we’re the only site that takes you from an abstract, general illustration of the cell to actual images.”
Segall: This is an extraordinary collection of images of cell components. The initial entry screen is quite nice, but it rapidly becomes just a list organized by species. I wonder if there is not a more user-friendly approach.Sanford: Well-organized, simple, and easy to navigate without extraneous pomp and circumstance.
WEBSITE RUNNERS UP
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
Holmes: Instantly bookmarked. I know I’ll need this as an authoritative reference site in the future. (Martin Humphries researches integrins atthe University of Manchester, UK) | Sanford: Great use of multimedia in this blog. A beautiful, informative, and entertaining site. | Kirby: This is a fun comic strip blog. It would have benefitted from more hyperlinks to sites with scientific information about the content of the strips. |
MEET THE JUDGES
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Interested in reading more?
