A Microplate Reader, circa 1981

Credit: Courtesy of Biotek Instruments Inc." /> Credit: Courtesy of Biotek Instruments Inc. In the late 1970s, researchers who wanted to quantify the results of new immunoprecipitation assays, such as ELISA, had three choices: risk human error and a headache by using a manual reader, break out the cuvets and the spectrophotometer, or pay as much as $15,000 for a bulky automated reader. In 1981, Winooski, Vt.-base

Bob Grant
Bob Grant

Bob Grant is Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer.

View full profile.


Learn about our editorial policies.

Apr 1, 2008
<figcaption> Credit: Courtesy of Biotek Instruments Inc.</figcaption>
Credit: Courtesy of Biotek Instruments Inc.

In the late 1970s, researchers who wanted to quantify the results of new immunoprecipitation assays, such as ELISA, had three choices: risk human error and a headache by using a manual reader, break out the cuvets and the spectrophotometer, or pay as much as $15,000 for a bulky automated reader.

In 1981, Winooski, Vt.-based, BioTek Instruments, introduced the EL307. Roughly the size of a toaster oven, the EL307 combined the ease of automated microplate reading with the low cost of the manual readers. Users still had to reposition their 96-well microplates by hand, but a spring-loaded device and magnets made this process easier than with purely manual readers. The EL307, shown here in a BioTek pamphlet from 1984—1985, was also directly connected to a printer that simultaneously recorded results from each well, eliminating the need to manually record each well's location. It took a...

Interested in reading more?

Magaizne Cover

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?