New Gene Finding Creates Controversy

Data derived from the Science Watch/Hot Papers database and the Web of Science (ISI, Philadelphia) show that Hot Papers are cited 50 to 100 times more often than the average paper of the same type and age. In October 2000, a collaboration of American, Japanese, German, and Swedish researchers accomplished a major first: They positionally cloned the gene associated with a common polygenic disorder, namely, type 2 diabetes or non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM).1 Despite this Hot Pap

Eugene Russo
Jul 7, 2002
Data derived from the Science Watch/Hot Papers database and the Web of Science (ISI, Philadelphia) show that Hot Papers are cited 50 to 100 times more often than the average paper of the same type and age.

In October 2000, a collaboration of American, Japanese, German, and Swedish researchers accomplished a major first: They positionally cloned the gene associated with a common polygenic disorder, namely, type 2 diabetes or non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM).1 Despite this Hot Paper's importance, researchers continue to dispute the significance of the gene across multiple ethnic populations. The intricacies of the positional cloning process and the investigators' seemingly unlikely culprit gene have generated skepticism from many.

As senior author Graeme Bell explains, positional cloning is difficult because the targeted genome regions are not as precisely defined by recombination events as they are with monogenic disorders. Instead, the gene's location is defined statistically. "We worked in...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?