© ISTOCK.COM/KTSIMAGE/ERAXIONEven the earliest scientists knew that temperature was an important vital sign, signifying sickness or health. In the 17th century, Italian physiologist Sanctorio Sanctorius invented an oral thermometer to monitor patients. Now, 21st-century researchers have set themselves a new, more challenging task: taking the temperatures of individual cells.
“Temperature is one kind of basic physical parameter which regulates life,” says Mikhail Lukin, a physicist at Harvard University who has developed a diamond-based intracellular temperature sensor. “It determines the speed of all sorts of processes which occur inside living systems.”
But although temperature is a basic vital sign, scientists have a relatively poor understanding of how it varies among and within cells. “It turns out that to measure temperature reliably inside the cell is not easy,” says Lukin. “You cannot stick a large thermometer in there and maintain the cell viability.”
In the last five years, however,...
Although temperature differences within the body tend to vary on the order of a few degrees, at most, researchers are beginning to suspect that small differences can alter cells’ chemistry and function, or tip off doctors to cancerous growth. Here, The Scientist profiles several methods for examining how temperature influences what’s going on inside cells.
Hitting on Hotspots
NAT COMMUN, 3:705, 2012Researchers: Seiichi Uchiyama, University of Tokyo; Madoka Suzuki, Waseda University, Singapore
Goal: Temperature influences myriad processes in the cell, from gene expression to protein-protein interactions. Suzuki, Uchiyama, and their colleagues seek to measure slight variations in temperature between different parts of cells. This may shed light on how heat is generated in the body and how local variation in temperature changes a cell’s chemistry.
Approach: Sensors containing fluorescent dyes, quantum dots, or other glowing materials can change in brightness depending on temperature. In the past several years, researchers have built tiny fluorescent thermometers that cells can ingest. Using microscopy, researchers can detect the thermometers’ glow and evaluate intracellular temperature.
Uchiyama first started mapping temperature distribution inside single cells in 2012, publishing his design for a fluorescent polymeric thermometer (Nat Commun, 3:705). The thermometer consisted of a fluorescent molecule attached to a polyacrylamide chain whose conformation changes with temperature, either quenching or activating fluorescence. The researchers were able to show that the nucleus is warmer than the cytoplasm and that the mitochondria radiate substantial heat in a monkey kidney–derived cell line. (These findings are controversial; see “Temperature Quandary” below.)
Uchiyama has since published other fluorescent sensor designs, most recently developing a faster fluorescent polymeric thermometer that relies on looking at the fluorescence ratio of a temperature-sensitive fluorophore to a temperature-insensitive one (Analyst, 140:4498-506, 2015). The researchers used the sensor to measure temperature in human embryonic kidney cells, finding that the nucleus was approximately 1 °C warmer than the cytoplasm.
When Suzuki first began to design a thermometer he remembers just gently pressing a glass microneedle that had a fluorescent dye enclosed in its tip against the membranes of cells and seeing if the fluorescence changed as temperature rose (Biophys J, 92:L46-L48, 2007). Eventually, he and his colleagues began to experiment with making fluorescent nanoparticles they could introduce into cells. The fluorescent molecules cannot be exposed to the chemical environment of the cell, because this can alter their brightness. “The nanothermometers should read out temperature change and should not respond to [other] environmental changes,” says Suzuki.
To protect the fluorescent reporters, the researchers embedded the molecules in a hydrophobic polymer and then encased this hydrophobic core within a hydrophilic polymer shell, creating particles that were, on average, 140 nm in diameter. To further guard against misinterpretation, Suzuki included two types of fluorophores, one sensitive to heat and one not. By measuring the ratio of the two fluorophores’ brightness, the team found that in cultured human cancer cells stimulated with a chemical that spurs cells to produce heat, the temperature varied locally (ACS Nano, 8:198-206, 2014).
The team has since developed a small-molecule thermometer composed of a yellow fluorescent dye that specifically targets mitochondria, the engines of heat generation in the cell (Chem Commun, 51:8044-47, 2015). Another small-molecule thermometer targets the endoplasmic reticulum—an organelle that also appears to help the cell to generate heat (Sci Rep, 4:6701, 2014).
Suzuki hopes to someday be able to develop intracellular thermometers with faster response times and greater temperature sensitivity so that they can identify other hotspots of heat production in the cell. For now, he says, sensors struggle to capture small bursts of heat that diffuse quickly. “The mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum are considered as heat sources,” says Suzuki, as is actomyosin in muscle cells. “There might be other heat sources which we have never imagined.”
Shine bright like a diamond
NATURE, 500:54-58, 2013Researcher: Mikhail Lukin, Harvard University
Goal: Lukin and his collaborators dream of using intracellular temperature to sort healthy cells from sick ones, and of regulating cellular processes by heating them up or cooling them down. “It opens a broad array of possibilities,” he says.
Approach: Lukin, a physicist, sought to differentiate himself from the pack by making thermometers out of diamond nanocrystals rather than fluorescent dyes or polymers. “We made use of basically quantum defects in diamonds, which are the so-called nitrogen-vacancy centers,” he explains. “It’s a defect where nitrogen substitutes [for] carbon.”
Nitrogen-vacancy centers have atomic spin states that change orientation when perturbed by light, magnetic fields, or, it turns out, temperature. “If the temperature of the nanocrystal changes, then what happens is that the separation between carbon atoms in the nanocrystal changes a little bit,” altering the spin state of electrons, says Lukin. When the researchers shine a laser on the diamond nanocrystals, the impurities glow, emitting varying fluorescence depending on their spin state and temperature. (See “Monitoring Magnetic Bugs,” The Scientist, October 2013.)
To test their method, the researchers also introduced gold nanoparticles into cells and heated the particles with lasers, allowing Lukin and his team to both control the temperatures of cells and monitor how their temperature control was working. The researchers found that they could detect changes as small as 0.0018 °C (Nature, 500:54-58, 2013).
Lukin and collaborators are now using temperature to explore and control the development of worms.
“It might allow you to selectively regulate various processes inside the cell,” he says. “It might allow you to accelerate development of some processes, decelerate development of others, or kill the cell if you don’t want this specific cell to play a role anymore.”
ACS NANO, 9:3134-42, 2015Researcher: Luís Carlos, University of Aveiro, Portugal; Angel Millán, Institute of Materials Science of Aragón, CSIC-University of Zaragoza, Spain
Goal: Carlos and Millán are trying to kill tumors by selectively applying lethal levels of heat to cancer cells, creating temperature gradients that destroy biomolecules and trigger cell death. But efforts to kill cancer cells using hyperthermia tend to falter for lack of a good way to ensure that cancer cells get hot enough while the surrounding tissue remains sufficiently cool.
Approach: Carlos and Millán recently designed a nanoparticle that is both a heater and a thermometer (ACS Nano, 9:3134-42, 2015). Researchers hoping to both heat and take the temperatures of cells have generally used separate particles for the two tasks. Carlos and Millán wanted to make sure they were measuring temperature exactly at the heat source, as heat can quickly dissipate over short spaces in cells. “If we don’t have the thermometer really in contact with the heater, we will not be able to measure the effective local temperature,” Carlos says.
The heater consists of a magnetic bead that heats up when exposed to a magnetic field. The thermometer consists of two fluorescent ions, one of which changes brightness with shifts in temperature. These are all enclosed in a polymer shell.
There are already clinical trials testing the use of magnetic bead–induced heating to kill cancer. But the researchers think that with their combined heater-thermometers they can heat cells more precisely, reducing both the number of nanoparticles needed and collateral damage beyond the tumor.
“If you internalize the nanoparticles specifically inside cancer cells, maybe just a few are enough to induce cell death,” says Millán. The researchers are currently heating cells in culture and monitoring their temperature and reactions.
More than skin-deep
ADV MATER, 27:4781-87, 2015Researcher: Daniel Jaque, Autonomous University of Madrid
Goal: Jaque’s team hopes to develop methods to measure temperature beneath animals’ skin and eventually in human tissue in vivo by using temperature sensors that give off fluorescent signals that penetrate flesh.
Approach: Most nanothermometers have a major limitation: they emit light waves in the visible range. This works fine for observing cells in culture or even in vivo in relatively transparent creatures, such as worms. But visible light cannot tell researchers much about cells below the skin in intact, opaque organisms. Much of the infrared spectrum, meanwhile, is highly absorbed by water, which is abundant in tissue.
There are, however, ranges of wavelengths that do penetrate tissue and avoid the water absorption problem. Light between 650 and 950 nm—red verging into infrared—is considered one biological window. Infrared light between 1,000 and 1,350 nm makes up a second biological window.
Jaque and his colleagues have been developing a thermometer that relies on fluorescence that can be excited and read in these biological windows. Most recently, Jaque, postdoc Emma Martín Rodríguez, and colleagues designed a thermometer that is excited in the first biological window and emits signals in the second (Adv Mater, 27:4781-87, 2015).
The thermometer is made up of quantum dots, whose fluorescence is quenched with rises in temperature, and temperature-insensitive fluorescent nanoparticles, all encapsulated in an FDA-approved polymer.
With current technologies, it is possible to sense temperature around 1?cm below animals’ skin. But to move to medical applications in humans, researchers will need to sense temperatures at much deeper levels. “We are just at the beginning of the history,” says Jaque.
Eventually, Jaque hopes to use nanothermometers to guide heat treatment for cancer. “You introduce nanoparticles that give a real-time measurement of temperature inside your body,” he says. Then, as you heat the tumor, “you can adjust the treatment not to burn the body.”
NAT COMMUN, 3:705, 2012Researchers including Madoka Suzuki and Seichii Uchiyama have recently measured what appear to be substantial temperature increases in living cells. In some cases, the temperature differences reach a few degrees Celsius—despite the absence of any outside heating of the cells. In September 2014, a group of French researchers challenged these findings, sparking a lively, year-long back-and-forth in the pages of Nature Methods (11:899-901, 2014; 12:801-03, 2015).
The French group performed calculations that seemed to show that a single cell just does not have enough energy to so quickly generate such a large temperature differential on its own. “Glucose is a molecule inside cells where energy comes from,” says coauthor Guillaume Baffou of Aix-Marseille University’s Institut Fresnel. “If you fill the whole volume of the cell with glucose, which is obviously not the case, and if you burn glucose, you will not achieve a temperature increase of one degree.”
“If we apply the conventional laws of thermodynamics . . . we arrive to the conclusion that it is not possible to have differences in temperature inside the cell around one degree coming from internal reactions,” agrees Luís Carlos of the University of Aveiro in Portugal, who was not involved in the correspondence. “But from an experimental point of view, there are several works done by several authors around the world showing differences in temperature greater than one degree.”
One possibility is that researchers observing large temperature increases in cells simply were making experimental errors. “The other hypothesis is that there is something that happens at the micro- and nanoscales concerning heat transfer that [is] not well-described by the conventional thermodynamics,” says Carlos.
Suzuki agrees that it is impossible for a whole cell to get hotter by a whole degree without outside heat input. However, “the calculation should not consider the temperature of the whole cell, the water ball, but a small volume inside the cell where the heat is produced and the temperature is measured.” Suzuki says that the next step will be measuring the thermal conductivity of living cells, with all their organelles and proteins filling the interior. This might help explain whether and how local areas of cells can heat up while the cell overall does not experience radical temperature change.
“Thermal biology is still at its infancy,” says Baffou. “There is no reliable temperature mapping for cells.”