ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Seven Academies back GMOs to feed the world

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are good for the poor and hungry, say seven national and international academies of science.

Robert Walgate

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are good for the poor and hungry, say seven national and international academies of science including the National Academy of Sciences in the USA, the Royal Society in the UK, the Chinese Academy, the academies of India, Brazil and Mexico, and the Third World Academy of Sciences, in a report published on 12 July.

In a carefully argued 17-page document, the academies conclude "it is critical that the potential benefits of GM technology become available to developing countries." Public-sector efforts could create transgenic maize, rice, wheat, cassava, yams, sorghum, plantains and sweet potatoes, which would be more stable in storage and more nutritious, benefiting poor farmers and improving their access to food "through employment-intensive production" of staples.

These balanced phrases clearly take account of widespread suspicions that commercial biotechnology research will not benefit the poor, and criticisms of the 'green revolution' of the past...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
ADVERTISEMENT