The United States’s scientific and engineering output has shrunk relative to that of the rest of the world, a new series of analyses from the National Science Board, the policymaking organization for the National Science Foundation, reveals. The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2020, a summary report published on Wednesday (January 15), finds that the adoption of American-style investment in science and engineering education in China and other countries has helped overseas nations grow their R&D economies at a faster rate than the US.
“The changing global landscape affects the position of the United States relative to the other major global players,” the report states. “For example, the United States has seen its relative share of global [science and technology] activity remain unchanged or shrink, even as its absolute activity levels have continued to rise.”
The report adds: “Increasingly, the United States...
Many of the largest increases in research spending for science and technology have been made by governments in Asian countries, with China catching up particularly fast with the US, the report finds. “We think that China may have overtaken the U.S. at some point in 2019,” Julia Phillips, the chair of the National Science Board (NSB) Science and Engineering Policy Committee, tells Science.
The report also notes that the US remains the leading nation for international students despite recent declines in enrollment from people overseas. Diversity in the workforce, meanwhile, has been increasing, although only modestly.
From 2003 to 2017, the proportion of the science and tech workforce made up by women rose from 26 percent to 29 percent, even though women make up more than half of the college-educated workforce. Over the same timeframe, the proportion of underrepresented minorities rose from 9 percent to 13 percent, despite the fact the group makes up 17 percent of the college-educated workforce.
Molly King, a sociologist at Santa Clara University in California who studies social inequalities in the scientific workforce, tells Nature she is “not terribly surprised by any of the statistics” on diversity, suggesting that stereotyping and bias in peer review and citation in the literature contribute to ongoing disparities.
The report doesn’t go into detail on the reasons for changes in the science and technology landscape, but does note that US government funding for R&D now accounts for a smaller proportion of overall funding than it did two decades ago, adding: “This decline is notable as federally funded R&D is an important source of support, particularly for the higher education sector and for the nation’s basic research enterprise.”
Phillips adds in a National Science Foundation press release that “federal support of basic research drives innovation. . . . Basic research is the ‘seed corn’ of our U.S. [science and engineering], a global competitive advantage, and the starting point for much of our GDP growth since World War II.”
Catherine Offord is an associate editor at The Scientist. Email her at firstname.lastname@example.org.