Menu

NSF Unveils New Sexual Harassment Policy

The measures include, in specific cases, terminating awards for researchers who have been found guilty in investigations by their institutions.

Sep 21, 2018
Catherine Offord

ABOVE: Sexual harassment is a particular problem at remote field sites such as the dry valleys of Antarctica, according to NSF-funded researcher Jane Willenbring, who has worked there.
WIKIMEDIA, DAVID SAUL

The National Science Foundation has announced a new sexual harassment policy that aims to improve accountability among its grant recipients. In information published on its website on Wednesday (September 19), the agency notes that, as of October 21, it will require institutions to report findings in any harassment investigations of researchers receiving NSF funding, and will take punitive action against those who have been found guilty.

“NSF is committed to ensuring the safety and security of the people our awards support,” NSF’s director, France Córdova, says in a statement. “When that safety is endangered through the actions of someone associated with an NSF award, the foundation will work to replace that person while preserving support for responsible members of the community.”

The NSF had announced plans to introduce the requirements back in February. The full terms and conditions will be published later today (September 21), a month before they go into effect. 

See “NSF Will Require Reporting of Sexual Harassment

For a grantee institution to keep NSF funding for a researcher found guilty of violating conduct rules, the institution must show that another scientist there can take over the project. If they can’t, the award may be suspended or terminated altogether.

“This rule is wonderful news and goes beyond what I expected,” geologist Jane Willenbring of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, California, tells Nature. Willenbring, who has pushed for safer working environments at NSF-funded research sites, suggests the next step might be for the organization to investigate allegations itself, instead of waiting for institutions to communicate their conclusions. 

Peggy Hoyle, NSF’s deputy general counsel, seemed to take a different line when speaking to reporters on Wednesday morning, saying that universities would have to take action against an employee before the organization could respond. “We are not interested in allegations, obviously, because due process is very important,” she said at a media briefing, reported by Science. “So in that sense, we need to know the finding or determination” before acting. 

The agency does look into allegations made by students and other participants of NSF programs, and may use information regarding sexual harassment claims when reviewing grantee institutions, according to Science.

The NSF’s announcement comes just days after the National Institutes of Health (NIH) outlined updates to its own sexual harassment policy. Although the agency’s plans include the introduction of a centralized reporting system for harassment, the NIH has not explicitly attached conditions like the ones imposed by the NSF to its grant funding, Nature reports.

See “NIH Announces Plans to Update Harassment Policies

October 2018

Bright Lights, Big Problems

Scientists are exploring the ecological damage caused by artificially lit night skies

Marketplace

Sponsored Product Updates

Neural Cell Culturing Guide

Neural Cell Culturing Guide

Download this guide from R&D Systems to learn the fundamental techniques and protocols for successfully isolating, culturing, and expanding specific cell types from the rodent central and peripheral nervous systems!

Immunophenotyping Extracellular Vesicles Using Amnis® Technology

Immunophenotyping Extracellular Vesicles Using Amnis® Technology

Download this application note to learn how the Amnis® time delay integration (TDI) image capturing system facilitates high-throughput flow cytometry with high sensitivity to submicron particles!

Improving Accuracy in Serial Dilutions Using the Electronic Pipette

Improving Accuracy in Serial Dilutions Using the Electronic Pipette

Electronic pipettes provide more accurate sample concentrations, reduced error propagation, and improved ergonomics. Download this application note from Sartorius to learn more!

Benefits of Electronic Pipette Use for Pipetting PCR Master Mix

Benefits of Electronic Pipette Use for Pipetting PCR Master Mix

Download this application note from Sartorius to explore how electronic pipettes can help ensure reproducible and reliable results when performing PCR-based assays.