A Scientific American forum on the controversial issue has some scientists crying foul, contending editors failed to delete misstatements. |
![]() TRUST BUSTED: UC-Berkeley’s Sharon Russell says her faith in Scientific American has been shaken. |
![]() "ACCURATE": Neal Barnard, coauthor of the piece under the most scrutiny, contends the disagreements are matters of opinion. |
Interested in reading more?
Become a Member of
Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?