ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Erosion Of Congressional Support For Supercollider Frustrates, Angers Nation's High-Energy Physicists

Many of them argue that, without the SSC, the field of particle physics may lose its vitality--maybe even its future The struggle in Congress over funding for the superconducting supercollider (SSC)--now something of an annual event--is disrupting work at the laboratory and raising frustrations throughout the high-energy physics community, say physicists. Many of them also worry not only about the future of the multibillion-dollar Waxahachie, Texas, project, but also about that of part

Franklin Hoke

Many of them argue that, without the SSC, the field of particle physics may lose its vitality--maybe even its future


The struggle in Congress over funding for the superconducting supercollider (SSC)--now something of an annual event--is disrupting work at the laboratory and raising frustrations throughout the high-energy physics community, say physicists. Many of them also worry not only about the future of the multibillion-dollar Waxahachie, Texas, project, but also about that of particle physics in the United States.

Already, failing support for the SSC in Washington, D.C., threatens recruitment to the project, they say, from student through professional levels. Some top particle physicists in the early to middle stages of their careers, disturbed by the prospect of waiting until the next century to begin experiments, are considering moves to accelerator laboratories outside the U.S., such as CERN in Geneva.

"What may be the most disturbing thing of all," says Steven...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?
ADVERTISEMENT