Medicine, Science, Public Health Must Merge For The Greater Good

My own background in schools of medicine and institutions for biomedical research perhaps leads me to stress the opportunities for those disciplines to impact research and education at schools of public health. While the agenda of such schools has turned more and more to hospital administration and the rationalization of the health-care system, this must not be to the neglect of using science for the most effective population-based measures to protect public health. These measures will be larg

Joshua Lederberg
Sep 1, 1996

My own background in schools of medicine and institutions for biomedical research perhaps leads me to stress the opportunities for those disciplines to impact research and education at schools of public health. While the agenda of such schools has turned more and more to hospital administration and the rationalization of the health-care system, this must not be to the neglect of using science for the most effective population-based measures to protect public health. These measures will be largely, not exclusively, in the preventive sphere (T. Hancock, M. Garrett, Futures, 27:935-51, 1995). However, the typical separation of schools of public health and medicine has left a major gap in the scientific education and social sensitization of both groups.

In 1988, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) conducted a study called "The Future of Public Health," chaired by the late Richard Remington, a professor of public health at the University of...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?