MORE FOR SSC: DOES IT MEAN LESS FOR OTHERS?

Volume 5, #5The Scientist March 4, 1991 MORE FOR SSC: DOES IT MEAN LESS FOR OTHERS? Author: Jeffrey Mervis Date: March 4, 1991 Every federal budget raises anew the question of whether a large increase sought for any one program will come at the expense of other programs. For scientists, the issue is best symbolized this year by the supercollider, for which the administration wants $300 million more on the road to completing the $8.25 billion facility in 1999. Administration of

Jeffrey Mervis
Mar 3, 1991


Volume 5, #5The Scientist March 4, 1991

MORE FOR SSC: DOES IT MEAN LESS FOR OTHERS?

Author: Jeffrey Mervis
Date: March 4, 1991

Every federal budget raises anew the question of whether a large increase sought for any one program will come at the expense of other programs. For scientists, the issue is best symbolized this year by the supercollider, for which the administration wants $300 million more on the road to completing the $8.25 billion facility in 1999.

Administration officials say they have adhered to a promise to scientists that the 54-mile-long proton-proton accelerator will not drain funds from other research projects, both within the Energy Department and throughout the government. But many analysts express disbelief at such claims, pointing to the discrepancy between the sharp rise in SSC funding and the essentially flat level of spending within high-energy physics in recent years.

"It must come out of...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?