Novel Application Of Federal Law To Scientific Fraud Worries Universities And Reinvigorates Whistleblowers

A federal law written with corrupt Department of Defense contractors in mind has become a serious concern for university administrators, while at the same time giving scientific-fraud whistleblowers new hope for success in pressing their charges. BREAKING NEW GROUND: Scientist-lawyer Eugene Dong first saw the scientific fraud aspects of the False Claims Act. The False Claims Act, also known as the Lincoln Law, was passed in 1863 and amended more than a century later, in 1986. Originally, the

Franklin Hoke
Sep 3, 1995
A federal law written with corrupt Department of Defense contractors in mind has become a serious concern for university administrators, while at the same time giving scientific-fraud whistleblowers new hope for success in pressing their charges.

Eugene Dong BREAKING NEW GROUND: Scientist-lawyer Eugene Dong first saw the scientific fraud aspects of the False Claims Act.


The False Claims Act, also known as the Lincoln Law, was passed in 1863 and amended more than a century later, in 1986. Originally, the law was written to find and punish unscrupulous Union Army suppliers. As applied in scientific fraud cases, the law allows whistleblowers to sue universities and their scientists on behalf of the government for recovery of up to three times the amount of research grants they believe involve fraudulent claims, plus additional penalties.

While several parties firmly support or oppose the act, some feel the problems of and solution to research fraud lie...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?