|An epidemiologist's move to attend a closed meeting spurs debate over freedom of information versus the right to privacy|
Notwithstanding the closed-door policy of the outside panel that advises the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Labarthe told the NHLBI director he intended to hear for himself what this august group of scientific and community leaders thought about his research project, which they had already turned down once. And, Labarthe said, he had the law on his side.
It was the first time in the memory of anyone at the heart institute, or the NIH general counsel's office, that a scientist had attempted to attend the closed segment of one of the council's quarterly meetings. The major...
Interested in reading more?
Become a Member of
Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?