Creation Of Sound Science Policy Hindered By Budget Debates

For too long, national debates on science and technology (S&T) policy have been conducted as a footnote to budget debates. Nagging and important issues, fundamental to the conduct and future of our national research and development (R&D) enterprise, have been left to languish while Congress debates artful accounting exercises that do not pencil out, budgets that are really Trojan horses for someone's ideological social blueprints, or "feel-good" proposals to increase spending on R&D

Rep. George Brown
Apr 13, 1997

For too long, national debates on science and technology (S&T) policy have been conducted as a footnote to budget debates. Nagging and important issues, fundamental to the conduct and future of our national research and development (R&D) enterprise, have been left to languish while Congress debates artful accounting exercises that do not pencil out, budgets that are really Trojan horses for someone's ideological social blueprints, or "feel-good" proposals to increase spending on R&D that have no basis in budgetary reality.

Left neglected by this myopic fixation on the need to balance the federal budget-a need generally recognized as a political and not an economic imperative-is a complicated set of issues affecting national S&T policy that requires immediate attention. The problem confronting the public- policy apparatus is akin to a transcendental equation. We are being asked to set a policy on S&T to lead the United States-and by inference much of...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?