New Antiterrorism Tenets Trouble Scientists

Artwork: Anne MacNamara When the anthrax assaults of last fall transformed bioterrorism from theoretical possibility to reality, Congress wasted little time cranking out new laws that target laboratory operations. Within weeks of the attack on the World Trade Center, the USA Patriot Act whipped through Congress and became law, adding criminal sanctions to existing "biological weapons" statutes. A scant seven months later, the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Response Act was signed, un

Peg Brickley
Oct 27, 2002
Artwork: Anne MacNamara

When the anthrax assaults of last fall transformed bioterrorism from theoretical possibility to reality, Congress wasted little time cranking out new laws that target laboratory operations. Within weeks of the attack on the World Trade Center, the USA Patriot Act whipped through Congress and became law, adding criminal sanctions to existing "biological weapons" statutes. A scant seven months later, the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Response Act was signed, underlining the need to control access to compounds and pathogens with weapons potential.

Critical questions about who will enforce the tougher laws and how they will go about it--enhanced reporting, surprise inspections, and regular audits--remain unclear. What is clear is that working scientists need to incorporate systems for keeping up with the pace of regulatory changes in their laboratory operations. No longer will an annual meeting with the university's environmental and safety advisors suffice. The Federal Register,...

Interested in reading more?

Magaizne Cover

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?