Eukaryotic origins

In the February 5 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Hyman Hartman and Alexei Fedorov describe the use of a genomic approach to investigate the relationship between Eukarya, Archaea and Bacteria (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:1429-1425).They defined a set of several hundred 'eukaryotic signature proteins' (ESPs) that have no homologs in Archaea or Bacteria. The 347 ESPs include cytoplasmic proteins, internal signaling proteins and nuclear proteins. Hartman and Fedorov used their

Jonathan Weitzman(jonathanweitzman@hotmail.com)
Feb 6, 2002

In the February 5 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Hyman Hartman and Alexei Fedorov describe the use of a genomic approach to investigate the relationship between Eukarya, Archaea and Bacteria (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:1429-1425).

They defined a set of several hundred 'eukaryotic signature proteins' (ESPs) that have no homologs in Archaea or Bacteria. The 347 ESPs include cytoplasmic proteins, internal signaling proteins and nuclear proteins. Hartman and Fedorov used their results to test the hypothesis that the nucleus was formed from the endosymbiosis of an archeon and a bacterium inside a third cell called a 'chronocyte'. Their analysis predicts that the chronocyte was an RNA-based cell that engulfed prokaryotic cells. This hypothesis is supported by the nature of the ESP collection.

The cytoplasmic ESPs include proteins involved in the cytoskeleton and phagocytosis. Internal ESPs regulate signaling through calcium ions, calmodulin, ubiquitin, GTP-binding...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?