ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Evidence that teaching hospitals have better survival outcomes

Quality of care for acute MI patients is better in teaching hospitals, perhaps because they practice evidence-based medicine.

(medwire@sciencenow.com)

LONDON, 14 September (SPIS MedWire). Whether quality of care is better in teaching versus non-teaching hospitals is controversial but a recent study published in JAMA suggests that patients with acute myocardial infarction treated in teaching hospitals tend to receive a better quality of care and have lower mortality than those who attend non-teaching hospitals.

A multicenter team, led by Jerome Allison from the University of Alabama at Birmingham, collected data on 114,411 elderly patients who were diagnosed with acute MI on admission to hospital. Overall, 439 major teaching hospitals, 455 minor teaching hospitals and 3,467 non-teaching hospitals were included in the analysis. Among the three types of hospital, respectively, administration rates for aspirin were 91.2%, 86.4% and 81.4% (p<0.001); for ACE inhibitors, 63.7%, 60.0% and 58.0% (p<0.001); for beta-blockers, 48.8%, 40.3% and 36.4% (p<0.001); and for reperfusion therapy, 55.5%, 58.9% and 55.2% (p=0.29). Differences in unadjusted 30-day, 60-day,...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
ADVERTISEMENT