Grass genomics

Comparative genomics provides a powerful approach to identifying conserved non-coding sequences that regulate gene transcription. In the April 30 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nicholas Kaplinsky and colleagues report the use of cross-species genomic DNA comparison to isolate conserved non-coding sequences in grass genomes (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:6147-6151).Kaplinsky et al. compared the genomic sequences of rice and maize, two domesticated species in the Poaceae family

Jonathan Weitzman(jonathanweitzman@hotmail.com)
Apr 29, 2002

Comparative genomics provides a powerful approach to identifying conserved non-coding sequences that regulate gene transcription. In the April 30 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nicholas Kaplinsky and colleagues report the use of cross-species genomic DNA comparison to isolate conserved non-coding sequences in grass genomes (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:6147-6151).

Kaplinsky et al. compared the genomic sequences of rice and maize, two domesticated species in the Poaceae family of grasses. Differences in regulatory sequences between grasses are thought to account for their morphological and physiological variation. They examined genomic sequences around the liguleless1 (lg1) gene, which is required to specify the ligule. They identified several conserved non-coding sequences by comparing genomic sequences, relative positions and lengths; and the conserved Ig1 non-coding sequences are also conserved in other grass species, including Staria, Arundo and bamboo.

Analysis of conserved non-coding sequences from other rice...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?