how clear is the crystal ball?

, and a recent report from the UK's House of Commons Science and Technology Committee raise serious concerns about the widespread use of predictive genetic testing.

Pete Moore(pete.moore@dial.pipex.com)
Apr 26, 2001

LONDON The genome landed amid a mass of orchestrated press releases and international media coverage. Some commentators prophesied the dawn of a new and glorious era — others poured forth scorn or doom-laden predictions. Now that a few months have passed, the British Medical Journal has decided it is time for another bout of more careful reflection, and today published a series of papers that together give a less than euphoric view of the future, much less the current utility of predictive genetic testing.

Add to this the British House of Commons' recently published report Genetics and Insurance, which roundly condemns the way that the UK's insurance industry has already started to use predictive testing, and the need for careful consideration becomes all too apparent.

Predictive genetic testing, says director of cancer genetics services at the University of North Carolina, James Evans, and co-authors (BMJ 2001, 322:1052-1056),...

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?