Anger Flares over EPA’s Perceived Science Censorship 

Protests are sparking over the Trump Administration’s latest move to silence a discussion around climate change. 

katya katarina zimmer
Katarina Zimmer

After a year teaching an algorithm to differentiate between the echolocation calls of different bat species, Katarina decided she was simply too greedy to focus on one field of science...

View full profile.


Learn about our editorial policies.

Oct 24, 2017

Environmental Protection Agency building, Washington, D.C.ISTOCK, JKBOWERSProtests have erupted in Rhode Island following the decision of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to keep three of its scientists from speaking at an event about the future of a local estuary in response to climate change.

The 30 or so protesters gathered angrily in Providence with signs including “Un-gag the EPA” and “Science not Silence,” according to the Associated Press. The decision was condemned by researchers as well as Democratic members of Congress. Rhode Island’s senior senator, Jack Reed, told the Washington Post on Monday: “This type of political interference, or scientific censorship—whatever you want to call it—is ill-advised and does a real disservice to the American public and public health.”

No clear explanation was given why the EPA scientists had been barred from speaking, according to The New York Times. They had been scheduled to discuss...

The agency’s decision to bar scientists from speaking is seen as the latest in a slew of prohibitive actions to silence a discussion around climate change, and is in line with what many see as increasing scientific censorship across various federal departments.

Earlier this year, the EPA removed some of its data on the human influence on the climate as well as most mentions of the term “climate change” from its website. In August, employees within the Department of Agriculture were instructed not to mention “climate change” or “global warming.” More recently, individual scientists were asked not to mention those terms in descriptions of their research when applying for grants funded by the Department of Energy.

“Can we censor science and get away with it? I would say I hope not,” John King, a professor of oceanography at the University of Rhode Island and chair of the science advisory committee of the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program, tells the Associated Press. “Our job is to inform policy. Hopefully it becomes good policy. Let us do our job, without fear of losing our jobs.”

 

Interested in reading more?

Anger Flares over EPA’s Perceived Science Censorship 

The Scientist ARCHIVED CONTENT

ACCESS MORE THAN 30,000 ARTICLES ACROSS MANY TOPICS AND DISCIPLINES

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archived stories, digital editions of The Scientist Magazine, and much more!
Already a member?