Menu

Anger Flares over EPA’s Perceived Science Censorship 

Protests are sparking over the Trump Administration’s latest move to silence a discussion around climate change. 

Oct 24, 2017
Katarina Zimmer

Environmental Protection Agency building, Washington, D.C.ISTOCK, JKBOWERSProtests have erupted in Rhode Island following the decision of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to keep three of its scientists from speaking at an event about the future of a local estuary in response to climate change.

The 30 or so protesters gathered angrily in Providence with signs including “Un-gag the EPA” and “Science not Silence,” according to the Associated Press. The decision was condemned by researchers as well as Democratic members of Congress. Rhode Island’s senior senator, Jack Reed, told the Washington Post on Monday: “This type of political interference, or scientific censorship—whatever you want to call it—is ill-advised and does a real disservice to the American public and public health.”

No clear explanation was given why the EPA scientists had been barred from speaking, according to The New York Times. They had been scheduled to discuss a scientific report, which EPA researchers helped write, on the ecological state of the Narragansett Bay and its estuary. The report comes to the conclusion that data on sea level projections and temperature do not bode well for the bay’s seagrass habitat, salt marshes, and fish populations. The event was hosted by EPA-funded Narragansett Bay Estuary Program.

The agency’s decision to bar scientists from speaking is seen as the latest in a slew of prohibitive actions to silence a discussion around climate change, and is in line with what many see as increasing scientific censorship across various federal departments.

Earlier this year, the EPA removed some of its data on the human influence on the climate as well as most mentions of the term “climate change” from its website. In August, employees within the Department of Agriculture were instructed not to mention “climate change” or “global warming.” More recently, individual scientists were asked not to mention those terms in descriptions of their research when applying for grants funded by the Department of Energy.

“Can we censor science and get away with it? I would say I hope not,” John King, a professor of oceanography at the University of Rhode Island and chair of the science advisory committee of the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program, tells the Associated Press. “Our job is to inform policy. Hopefully it becomes good policy. Let us do our job, without fear of losing our jobs.”

 

November 2018

Intelligent Science

Wrapping our heads around human smarts

Marketplace

Sponsored Product Updates

Slice® Safety Cutters for Lab Work

Slice® Safety Cutters for Lab Work

Slice cutting tools—which feature our patent-pending safety blades—meet many lab-specific requirements. Our scalpels and craft knives are well suited for delicate work, and our utility knives are good for general use.

The Lab of the Future: Alinity Poised to Reinvent Clinical Diagnostic Testing and Help Improve Healthcare

The Lab of the Future: Alinity Poised to Reinvent Clinical Diagnostic Testing and Help Improve Healthcare

Every minute counts when waiting for accurate diagnostic test results to guide critical care decisions, making today's clinical lab more important than ever. In fact, nearly 70 percent of critical care decisions are driven by a diagnostic test.

LGC announces new, integrated, global portfolio brand, Biosearch Technologies, representing genomic tools for mission critical customer applications

LGC announces new, integrated, global portfolio brand, Biosearch Technologies, representing genomic tools for mission critical customer applications

LGC’s Genomics division announced it is transforming its branding under LGC, Biosearch Technologies, a unified portfolio brand integrating optimised genomic analysis technologies and tools to accelerate scientific outcomes.