That UCSD is crying foul is somewhat surprising. Universities routinely recruit top researchers, luring them to new positions at new institutions. But UCSD says that USC crossed the line by committing contract interference, civil conspiracy, and “computer crimes” in poaching Aisen. According to the suit, Aisen left UCSD with eight colleagues, seeking to rebuild his lab and shift his $55 million dollar National Institute on Aging grant to USC. “We are proud of our work, grateful for our partners and disappointed that one faculty member has chosen to separate in such a way that puts the ADCS’ [Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study] work in jeopardy,” UCSD Chancellor Pradeep Khosla wrote in a statement to the LA Times. The paper reported Sunday (July 5) that UCSD is seeking an undisclosed sum of money in the dispute.
USC officials denied any wrongdoing. “We are surprised and disappointed that the University of California San Diego elected to sue its departing faculty member and his team, as well as USC, rather than manage this transition collaboratively, as is the well-accepted custom and practice in academia,” USC said in a statement to the LA Times.
UCSD and USC have a history of chilly relations. When USC made a failed bid to take over the ailing Scripps Research Institute last year, UCSD’s Khosla suggested that his university would make a more suitable partner for Scripps.