Bush's budget cuts life science dollars

In his FY 2009 linkurl:budget,;http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2009/ released this morning, President George W. Bush calls to freeze the National Institutes of Health's budget at linkurl:last year's level;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54032/ of about $29 billion while shaving more than $370 million from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2008 budget. The president's budget also suggests decreasing research funding at the US Department of Agriculture by more than

Bob Grant
Bob Grant

Bob Grant is Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer.

View full profile.


Learn about our editorial policies.

Feb 3, 2008
In his FY 2009 linkurl:budget,;http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2009/ released this morning, President George W. Bush calls to freeze the National Institutes of Health's budget at linkurl:last year's level;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54032/ of about $29 billion while shaving more than $370 million from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2008 budget. The president's budget also suggests decreasing research funding at the US Department of Agriculture by more than $350 million, but proposes increasing the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) budget by 5.7 percent over last year, giving the agency $2.4 billion in FY 2009. Not surprisingly, life science research advocacy groups are decrying the president's slight to biomedical research. "Our continued progress in medicine and advances in health are dependent upon our investment in basic research," said Robert Palazzo, president of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB), in a statement released by the organization. In an linkurl:opinion piece;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/54044/ in __The Scientist__'s January...
al Institutes of Health's budget at linkurl:last year's level;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54032/ of about $29 billion while shaving more than $370 million from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2008 budget. The president's budget also suggests decreasing research funding at the US Department of Agriculture by more than $350 million, but proposes increasing the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) budget by 5.7 percent over last year, giving the agency $2.4 billion in FY 2009. Not surprisingly, life science research advocacy groups are decrying the president's slight to biomedical research. "Our continued progress in medicine and advances in health are dependent upon our investment in basic research," said Robert Palazzo, president of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB), in a statement released by the organization. In an linkurl:opinion piece;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/54044/ in __The Scientist__'s January issue, Palazzo argued that the US needs funding increases to maintain the lead in life science research worldwide. "If this proposal moves forward, it would represent the sixth year of essentially flat-funding for NIH," Palazzo noted in the statement. "This is an injustice to the patients and their families suffering from conditions for which research funded by NIH is their only hope." "By ignoring the importance of research to our nation's health and economic well-being, this proposal exacerbates the troubling pattern we have seen for the past five years," said linkurl:Mary Woolley,;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/12209/ president of medical and health research advocacy group Research!America in a statement released by the organization. "This disappointing budget undermines the President's own efforts to make our nation more competitive in the global marketplace," Woolley continued. (__The Scientist__'s president and founding editor, Eugene Garfield, sits on Research!America's board of directors.) Other groups including the Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research and the linkurl:American Association of Medical Colleges;http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/pressrel/2008/080204.htm have also expressed disappointment over the president's budget.

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?