“What we have right now, if we can scale it up and make sure it works well, is already enough to form the basis of a clinical trial to cure sickle cell disease with gene editing,” study coauthor Mark DeWitt, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of California, Berkeley, told The Los Angeles Times. His team published its results yesterday (October 12) in Science Translational Medicine.
As STAT News pointed out, the technique is not 100 percent efficient. Only a fraction of the treated cells successfully ended up with the right edits; and only 2 percent to 6 percent of the corrected cells retained the edits after 16 weeks once administered to the mice. “A few percent might seem low, said Jacob Corn, scientific director of the [UC Berkeley] Innovative Genomics Initiative and a co-leader of the study, but studies suggest that having just 2 percent to 5 percent of healthy red blood cells could be enough to cure sickle cell,” STAT reported.
Stuart Orkin, a blood stem cell biologist at Harvard Medical School who was not involved in the work, told Chemical & Engineering News that CRISPR is just one route to repair the gene that causes sickle cell anemia. “There is heightened interest given the hoopla around CRISPR/Cas9 but there are other ways to edit,” Orkin said. “Ultimately, the approach that achieves excellent patient outcomes without side-effects is what is desired and there may be several different ways to achieve this end.”