In order to linkurl:evolve;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23321/ novel traits, organisms may depend upon smaller, less dramatic mutations that they amass through their evolutionary history rather than suddenly acquiring a single mutation that gives them drastically different phenotypes, according to a study published online today (Jun 2) in __PNAS__. Whether an organism arrives at major evolutionary innovations through a single key mutation or a history of many accumulated mutations has been hotly debated by evolutionary biologists. The findings are "perhaps the most rigorous, clear-cut demonstration of the role of historical contingency," in evolution, said linkurl:Richard Lenski;https://www.msu.edu/user/lenski/ of Michigan State University, the study's main author. Examining linkurl:__E. coli__;http://www.the-scientist.com/2007/3/1/65/2/ cultures that his lab has maintained since 1988, Lenski found that one population of the bacterium had evolved the ability to metabolize citrate -- an unprecedented trait -- after more than 30,000 generations, or approximately 15 years. So Lenski and his colleagues consulted their "frozen fossil record,"...
Interested in reading more?
Become a Member of
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?