“PD-1 is truly a game-changer. It’s active in a way that other drugs are not,” Lynn Schuchter, a medical oncologist who heads the melanoma program at the Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania and has assisted in clinical trials of the Merck drug, told WSJ. “And what’s been interesting is the activity of PD-1 beyond melanoma. It looks to be active in bladder and renal and lung cancer. So this is bigger than melanoma.”
In a clinical trial this summer, more than two-thirds of advanced melanoma patients who received pembrolizumab survived at least one year post-treatment; 62 percent were alive after 18 months, the researchers reported. The trial also revealed notable tumor shrinkage in about one-third of patients. Merck now must run two additional trials “to verify that the drug can prolong lives and delay the progression of disease,” The New York Times (NYT) reported.
While pembrolizumab is the first PD-1 inhibitor approved for use in the U.S., another drug of this class, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and Ono Pharmaceutical’s nivolumab was recently approved in Japan. Both drugs come with a hefty price tag: $150,000 per year, for Merck’s pembrolizumab; $143,000 a year for BMS and Ono’s nivolumab, which is likely to soon be reviewed US regulators, according to WSJ. Roche and AstraZeneca also have PD-1 inhibitors in development. (For more on other types of immunotherapies, see “Deploying the Body’s Army,” The Scientist, April 2014.)
“This [approval] is really opening up a whole new avenue of effective therapies previously not available,” Louis Weiner, director of the Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center in Washington and a spokesman for the American Association for Cancer Research, told NYT. “It allows us to see a time when we can treat many dreaded cancers without resorting to cytotoxic chemotherapy.”
Update (September 8): Shortly after posting this story, The Scientist learned that Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceuticals, which recently saw their PD-1 inhibitor approved in Japan, are suing Merck for violating the BMS/Ono patent "for a method of harnessing the body's immune system to fight cancer," WSJ reported.