Following the Funding

Researchers use network theory to estimate the importance of relationships among researchers and institutions in attracting grant money.

Jef Akst
Jef Akst

Jef Akst is managing editor of The Scientist, where she started as an intern in 2009 after receiving a master’s degree from Indiana University in April 2009 studying the mating behavior of seahorses.

View full profile.


Learn about our editorial policies.

A network of collaborations among universities and industrial entities funded by the United Kingdom’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council between 1985 and 2013.COURTESY OF ATHEN MACertain networks of institutional collaborations are more successful in securing grants than others, according to a new study of 43,000 U.K. government-funded research projects. The analysis was published in PNAS last week (October 26). The “rich club,” as Phys.org called it, attracted more resources, but also produced “research with notable breadth and depth.” In other words, government funding is unequally distributed among research institutions, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing “as far as the quality and variety of research are concerned,” Phys.org reported.

“This [successful network] is likely to have arisen due to [the institutions’] ability to develop a broad range of expertise and extend partnerships with specialist entities,” the authors wrote in their paper. “In addition to that, these universities...

Interested in reading more?

The Scientist ARCHIVES

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?