Since the blog was launched 6 months ago, Brookes and his team have “documented over 500 problematic images in over 300 publications,” he wrote in a blog post since taken down, according to ScienceInsider. Brookes was aware of the potential legal consequences of accusing scientists of fraud, but said in a statement on the site that he ignored cease-and-desist letters because he was merely “highlighting what's already out there and allowing readers to draw their own conclusions.”
Over the past few weeks, however, Brookes received threats from lawyers acting on behalf of scientists whose work had been discussed on the blog. Brookes wrote that one lawyer had subpoenaed his personal contact information and emailed it to dozens of other scientists, stating that “his hate website is a menace to scientific society.” The email further encouraged recipients to “please forward this email onto your institutions and ask for legal representation.”
For his part, Brookes admitted that some of his strong language and the accusatory title of the blog might have been a mistake. But he also wrote that he hopes to continue ferreting out potential falsification via a new website under his real name.
Since Science Fraud was suspended, a Brazilian scientist Rui Curi of the University of Sao Paulo, whose publications contained Western blots discussed on the blog, has had a paper featuring one of these figures retracted, according to Retraction Watch.