ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Game, set, matching umpire calls in tennis

Umpires at Wimbledon, Roland Garros, and Arthur Ashe Stadium might deserve a break, according to a new linkurl:study;http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/1172753827346768 published online this week in Proceedings of the Royal Society B. The study found that disputes over close calls during professional tennis matches arise because of double faults in the way information is processed in the brains of players and umpires. Nonetheless, both perceptions are remarkably accurate, though umpires ar

Elie Dolgin
Umpires at Wimbledon, Roland Garros, and Arthur Ashe Stadium might deserve a break, according to a new linkurl:study;http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/1172753827346768 published online this week in Proceedings of the Royal Society B. The study found that disputes over close calls during professional tennis matches arise because of double faults in the way information is processed in the brains of players and umpires. Nonetheless, both perceptions are remarkably accurate, though umpires are in the right most of the time. At next month's French Open, tennis balls will fly across the court at linkurl:speeds;http://www.the-scientist.com/2007/11/1/82/1/ of up to 150 mph. In such a fast-moving sport, arguments often erupt between players and umpires as to whether a ball bounces inside or outside the boundary lines. So in 2006, major tennis tournaments introduced a high-tech, ball-tracking system called linkurl:Hawk-Eye;http://www.hawkeyeinnovations.co.uk/ that can pinpoint the ball's position to within a tenth of an inch. Line calls are still made by...
The Scientist

Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
ADVERTISEMENT