Impact Forecasts Cloudy

Current models do a poor job of predicting the impact individual scientists will have, according to a study.

Abby Olena
Oct 31, 2013

FLICKR, DANIEL WEHNERWhen a hiring committee or a grant study section evaluates a candidate, it must look at past achievements as a predictor of future success. In addition to other metrics, these groups are increasingly using the h-index, which is a score calculated based on one’s publication and citation records. But researchers from Aalto University School of Science in Finland and the IMT Institute for Advanced Studies in Italy have shown that models based on the h-index are flawed, and that they do a poor job of predicting the impact that a scientist will have in the future. Their work was published this week (October 29) in Scientific Reports.

The researchers used publication and citation data from 476 physicists, 236 cell biologists, and 50 mathematicians and also calculated those researchers’ h-indices. By comparing these three metrics, they showed that for each, “the correlation between past and...

“Based on our results, the predictability of current models for real application in recruitment decisions is questionable,” coauthor Santo Fortunato said in a press release. “Efforts to model future impact need to be aimed more directly at applications in the career advancement decision process.”