Evidence of possible data manipulation in Peyroche’s papers was first published last November on PubPeer, a website that lets users critique published research. Five articles that she coauthored between 2001 and 2012 are criticized on the site.
Peyroche and her colleagues responded to two of the threads, but the criticisms were serious enough for a committee at the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) to seek more information from the researchers. A panel of reviewers was set up to hear clarifications from the papers’ coauthors in early January, Le Monde reports. That process was disrupted by the announcement of Petit succeeding Peyroche.
It’s not clear whether Peyroche’s replacement was premature. Benoît Le Tallec, first author of two of the papers in question, had prepared responses to the criticisms, which he believed would “end the controversy,” according to a Google translation of the Le Monde piece. His former manager, however, had not forwarded these to PubPeer.
Still, the misconduct evaluation committee remains at work, according to Le Monde, even as Petit steps in at the helm of CNRS.