Judge Wants Info on PubPeer Commenter

In a defamation lawsuit involving anonymous comments on the post-publication peer review website, a judge requests potentially identifying information.

kerry grens
Kerry Grens

Kerry served as The Scientist’s news director until 2021. Before joining The Scientist in 2013, she was a stringer for Reuters Health, the senior health and science reporter at...

View full profile.

Learn about our editorial policies.

PIXABAY, NEMOA Michigan Circuit Court judge has asked PubPeer, a post-publication peer review website, to provide information about an anonymous commenter at the center of an ongoing lawsuit, Retraction Watch reported. Earlier this month, the judge tossed out a request to reveal the identities of other online commenters who critiqued the work of a Wayne State University pathologist.

“We are disappointed with the ruling and are weighing our options for how to continue to fight for the right to anonymity of PubPeer’s commenters,” Alexander Abdo, PubPeer’s attorney, told Retraction Watch.

Wayne State’s Fazlul Sarkar, believing he lost a job because of anonymous criticisms posted to PubPeer, is suing certain users of the site. The commenter at the focus of this particular dispute may have insight into the reasons for Sarkar’s lost position.

Nicholas Roumel, the lawyer representing Sarkar, told Retraction Watch: “we have no intention of publicly exposing...

Interested in reading more?

The Scientist ARCHIVES

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?