Precision medicine, sometimes referred to as personalized medicine, is an increasingly prevalent approach, championed by President Barack Obama in his 2015 State of the Union address. Researchers will begin screening and enrolling patients in the Phase 2 NCI-MATCH trial at 2,400 US clinical sites next month. Doroshow said at the briefing announcing the launch of the study that he expects it to cost $30 million to $40 million, though the price tag may change as the trial progresses.
Cancer researchers are hopeful that the NCI-MATCH trial and ASCO’s Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) study, which was also announced Monday, will advance precision medicine and increase scientists’ understanding of basic cancer biology. “That’s the promise of precision medicine,” José Baselga of New York City’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center told The Washington Post. “You [now] have the capability to identify what’s driving the particular tumor and then to devise methodologies that result in a better understanding of the disease and the development of better therapies. That’s where the optimism resides.”
Ten pharmaceutical companies are providing more than 20 drugs—some that are currently on the market and others that are still in development—to be used in the NCI-MATCH trial. These include Pfizer’s crizotinib (Xalkori), which functions as a protein kinase inhibitor, and GSK’s trametinib (Mekinist), a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor.
The smaller TAPUR trial, which will begin enrolling patients by the end of the year, is designed to test already approved drugs targeted to specific mutations, but in tumors located in tissues other than those in the compounds’ original indications.
“These are trials that are an acknowledgment that we are in the midst of the era of precision medicine,” Sandra Horning, chief medical officer and head of global product development at Roche—which is providing drugs for the trials—told The Wall Street Journal. “It will be a great way to learn where targeted therapies might have utility that we don’t understand.”