On “Geniuses” and Gender Gaps

Perceptions of a need for brilliance to excel in a field of study may contribute to its relatively low numbers of women, researchers report.

Jef Akst
Jef Akst

Jef Akst is managing editor of The Scientist, where she started as an intern in 2009 after receiving a master’s degree from Indiana University in April 2009 studying the mating behavior of seahorses.

View full profile.


Learn about our editorial policies.

Jan 19, 2015

FLICKR, ABOUTMODAFINIL.COMA survey of 1,820 academics across 30 different fields of study revealed that attitudes about the importance of intelligence—as opposed to hard work—may contribute to the varying gender gaps across academia. Specifically, an expectation of brilliance was found in those fields where there are still relatively few women scholars, according to the results published in Science last week (January 16).

“We’re not saying women aren’t brilliant or can’t succeed in a field that requires brilliance,” Cimpian told Science News’s Scicurious. “It’s the culture of the field that undermines representation because of stereotypes.”

The survey, conducted by Princeton philosopher Sarah-Jane Leslie, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign psychologist Andrei Cimpian, and their collaborators, aimed to uncover the underlying reasons that some fields still face a significant gender gap. In philosophy, for example, women receive fewer than 35 percent of awarded PhDs; in physics, women earn fewer than 20...

“In a nutshell, the issue is not with women’s aptitude, but rather with these disciplines’ attitudes,” Leslie told The Chronicle of Higher Education. “If we can adjust these attitudes, then we are confident that this will lead to increased diversity across the whole range of academic disciplines.”

The researchers also found a similar association between an expectation of intelligence and African Americans’ under-representation in a given field. Like women, African-Americans also face stereotypes about intellectual ability. 

Interested in reading more?

The Scientist ARCHIVES

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?