The federal agency is “deeply dismayed that one of their tags may have had something to do with the death of this whale,” NOAA Chief Science Advisor Richard Merrick, a former whale researcher, told National Geographic.
The accident, which seems to have resulted from improper sterilization of the dart that held the satellite tag, has raised concerns about the safety of such field biology tagging protocols, especially as used in the study of threatened or endangered populations. L95 was one of only 83 so-called Southern Resident orcas in his population.
Satellite tagging “is becoming more widespread, becoming commercially available to scientists all over the world, but the level of experience and training people have around the world varies,” Alex Zerbini, a NOAA scientist who has studied the impacts of tagging on whales, told National Geographic. “We need to be very careful. We need to take every precaution.”
According to the investigation into L95’s death, the satellite tag likely introduced a fungal pathogen into the animal’s circulatory system, and its already-weakened immune system could not fight off the infection.
NOAA has suspended the tagging of endangered orcas, and the agency will assess whether to pursue less invasive tracking methods, such as acoustic monitoring, according to National Geographic.
“There are only 82 of these orcas left. Each whale matters,” wrote Giulia Good Stefani, an attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council, wrote in a blog post published last week (October 7). “We can learn from the loss of Nigel, and together help ensure losing him was not for nothing.”