Push For Data Disclosure

Two federal health agencies released proposed rules that would tighten the requirements for reporting clinical trial results.

kerry grens
Kerry Grens

Kerry served as The Scientist’s news director until 2021. Before joining The Scientist in 2013, she was a stringer for Reuters Health, the senior health and science reporter at...

View full profile.

Learn about our editorial policies.

FLICKR, SAM_CATCHThe results of medical experiments on humans often never make it into the public arena, but drug regulators in Europe and the U.S. have been pushing for more—and speedier—reporting by drug developers. In the latest move by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the agencies proposed more expansive requirements for clinical trial data to make it into the online trial repository

“To honor [trial] participants’ selfless commitment to advancing biomedical science, researchers have an ethical obligation to share the results of clinical trials in a swift and transparent manner,” NIH Director Francis Collins and Deputy Director Kathy Hudson wrote at the NIH Director’s Blog. “Unfortunately, the timely public reporting of results has not been consistent across the clinical trials enterprise.”

According to the NIH, of the 178,000 clinical trials registered at, just 15,000 summary results have been published...

Advocates for clinical trial transparency supported the proposal. Peter Doshi of the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy told The Wall Street Journal’s Pharmalot: “Clearly, it’s important as ultimately the rules surrounding affects healthcare providers’ ability to accurately assess the risk and benefits of interventions.”

There is some concern, however, that existing rules aren’t currently enforced. According to Nature News, Jennifer Miller, a bioethicist at Duke University, has found that the results of most trials, even studies of approved drugs, aren’t reported on “If you were going to expand or enhance [the current rules], you would think there would be considerations around monitoring and enforcement of the existing law,” Miller told Nature News.

Interested in reading more?

The Scientist ARCHIVES

Become a Member of

Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?