“This is an interesting strategy that impedes the propagation of the virus,” biochemist Reinhard Sterner of the University of Regensburg in Germany told The Scientist. “It could be a new mode of viral resistance, which is pretty cool.”
The project got its start from an interest in plants. Specifically, Asunción Delgado and colleagues at the University of Granada knew that proteins in plants that aid viral replication haven’t evolved so much so that they can avoid being hijacked by viruses. So, the team wondered whether a different version of a protein, possibly an ancestral form, could keep an organism alive but prevent viral replication.
Thioredoxin was a good test subject: it is found in all modern organisms and is essential for both hosts and invading viruses. In the new study, Delgago and colleagues studied the genetic sequences of a range of microbial organisms, traced their ancestry, and identified the sequences for ancient thioredoxins, dating from 1.5 billion to 4 billion years ago.
The team then mixed the altered E. coli with bacteriophage T7, which normally recruits thioredoxin in bacteria for help in DNA replication. “The virus inserted its DNA into the bacterium without any trouble. But, when the virus went to recruit thioredoxin for its own purposes, that was a problem,” Sanchez-Ruiz said. Thioredoxins that were roughly 2.5 billion years and older couldn’t be used by the virus for DNA replication. The team also tried the experiment with the human form of thioredoxin, which prevented the virus from replicating, too.
Swapping a protein essential to both the host organism and the virus infecting that organism could confer viral resistance. The strategy could be applied to boosting plants’ resistance to viruses, Sanchez-Ruiz said.
“A big hurdle [to deploying ancient proteins in crops] that must be overcome is that the parts of the protein that do not interact with the pathogen do evolve, albeit more slowly than the pathogen-associated parts,” wrote Michael Harms, an evolutionary biophysicist at the University of Oregon, in an email to The Scientist. “As a result, ancestral proteins do not necessarily directly replace their modern counter parts.”
Harms explained that in commercial plants, growth rate, taste, color, and a number of other traits are important. An ancestral gene might compromise one of the many desired traits, even though it might protect against infection. “Because of this, I suspect that ancestral proteins may be a starting point for engineering more resistant plants rather than a standalone, turn-key solution.”
A. Delgado et al., “Using resurrected ancestral proviral proteins to engineer virus resistance.” Cell Reports, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.037, 2017.