Hints of a Helix, circa 1947

Hints of a Helix, circa 1947 By Elie Dolgin Nondegraded DNA from calf thymus. Appearing by Permission of the Museum of the History of Science, University of Oxford. MHS inv. 37391 Nearly four decades after biochemist Phoebus Levene first postulated his "tetranucleotide hypothesis" in 1910, most scientists still believed that DNA was made up of equal numbers of the four nucleotide bases in a repeating tetrameric structure, with ea

Elie Dolgin
May 1, 2009

Hints of a Helix, circa 1947

By Elie Dolgin

Nondegraded DNA from calf thymus. Appearing by Permission of the Museum of the History of Science, University of Oxford. MHS inv. 37391

Nearly four decades after biochemist Phoebus Levene first postulated his "tetranucleotide hypothesis" in 1910, most scientists still believed that DNA was made up of equal numbers of the four nucleotide bases in a repeating tetrameric structure, with each subunit containing all four bases.

Then in 1947, John Masson Gulland, together with Dennis Oswald Jordan and their colleagues at University College, Nottingham, perfected a method of extracting DNA from calf thymus glands. Importantly, their protocol avoided the use of acid or alkali, which kept the solution at a constant neutral pH, allowing them to isolate pure, fibrous, nondegraded DNA (labeled 'desoxyribose nucleic acid' in Gulland's handwriting on the vial at right). When they added strong acids or bases to the...

These results, along with Erwin Chargaff's 1950 discovery that DNA contains equal amounts of adenine and thymine and equal amounts of cytosine and guanine, paved the way for James Watson and Francis Crick's discovery that the molecule is, in fact, a double helix. As Watson put it in The Double Helix (1970): "A rereading of J.M. Gulland's and D.O. Jordan's papers... made me finally realize the strength of their conclusion that a large fraction, if not all, of the bases formed hydrogen bonds to other bases."

Gulland died in a railway accident in northern England on October 26, 1947. "His death means a sad and irreparable loss to us all," Chagraff wrote in the Annual Reviews of Biochemistry in 1948 (17:201–26).


Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

Receive full access to digital editions of The Scientist, as well as TS Digest, feature stories, more than 35 years of archives, and much more!
Already a member?