PNAS scraps special submission

A leading scientific journal has done away with a manuscript submission option that allowed members of the National Academy of Sciences to usher papers from non-members through the peer review process. The __Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences__ (__PNAS__) offered the option, called "Track I," to members of the Academy as a way to bring papers written by non-members to the journal's attention. Members were allowed to "communicate" two Track I papers per year, and were responsible fo

| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share
A leading scientific journal has done away with a manuscript submission option that allowed members of the National Academy of Sciences to usher papers from non-members through the peer review process. The __Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences__ (__PNAS__) offered the option, called "Track I," to members of the Academy as a way to bring papers written by non-members to the journal's attention. Members were allowed to "communicate" two Track I papers per year, and were responsible for procuring at least two reviews of the manuscript before submitting it to the __PNAS__ editorial office. Starting July 1, 2010, __PNAS__ will require non-members to submit manuscripts to the journal via the normal route, "Track II," according to linkurl:__ScienceInsider__.;http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2009/09/the-academys-jo.html A paper submitted via this route is screened by a __PNAS__ editorial board member, who decides whether the paper is scientifically sound and likely to represent the top 10% of its field. If the paper passes muster, the board member hands it off to an Academy member for editing. "Since the introduction of Track II as the general route for submitted papers, many members will no longer communicate papers through Track I," wrote Alan Fersht, a __PNAS__ associate editor, in a 2005 linkurl:editorial;http://www.pnas.org/content/102/18/6241.full.pdf in the journal. But in 2009 __PNAS__ has published approximately 390 papers (about 12.5% of the total published) that were submitted using the Track I route, according to __ScienceInsider__. Researchers submitting papers to __PNAS__ will still be allowed to suggest referees and editors for their manuscripts. __Editor's Note (10th Sept.) - linkurl:Here;http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/09/08/0909515106.full.pdf+html?sid=b8e6becf-082b-4f07-bd96-c28143c850f3 is the __PNAS__ editorial that explains the decision to ditch Track I.__
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Does It Pay To Know An Academy Member?;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/18006/
[13th April 1998]*linkurl:Editors' Advice To Rejected Authors: Just Try, Try Again;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/17713/
[15th September 1997]
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Bob Grant

    From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer.
Share
Image of people clinking glasses with various alcoholic beverages at a table.
January 2025, Issue 1

Why Do Some People Get Drunk Faster Than Others?

Genetics and tolerance shake up how alcohol affects each person, creating a unique cocktail of experiences.

View this Issue
Sex Differences in Neurological Research

Sex Differences in Neurological Research

bit.bio logo
An illustration of colorful shapes.

Real-Time Image-Enabled Cell Sorting 

BD
New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

Sino
Wastewater surveillance conceptual visualization of a water droplet containing different microorganism

Elevating Wastewater Epidemiology with Microfluidics

Products

Takara Bio

Takara Bio USA Holdings, Inc. announces the acquisition of Curio Bioscience, adding spatial biology to its broad portfolio of single-cell omics solutions

Sapio Sciences

Sapio Sciences Announces Enhanced Capabilities for Chemistry, Immunogenicity, GMP and Molecular Biology

Biotium Logo

Biotium Unveils the Most Sensitive Stains for DNA or RNA with New EMBER™ Ultra Agarose Gel Kits

Cytosurge Logo

Cytosurge Announces Strategic Leadership Transition