Skip to main content

Sick, Immobile Young Ants Send “Kill Me” Signal to Colony Workers

Cocooned ants infected with a deadly fungus call on workers to kill them to protect the colony—the first example of altruistic disease signaling in social insects.

Written byAndrea Lius, PhD
| 2 min read
Several worker ants check on the colony’s young (transparent) for pathogenic infection.
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

Adult ants that have been infected with deadly pathogens often leave the colony to die so as not to infect others. But, “like infected cells in tissue, [young ants] are largely immobile and lack this option,” said Sylvia Cremer, a researcher at the Institute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA) who studies how social insects such as ants fight diseases collectively as superorganisms, in a statement.

Cremer’s team previously found that invasive garden ant pupae that have been infected with a deadly fungal pathogen produced chemicals that induced worker ants to unpack their cocoons and kill them, preventing the disease from spreading to the rest of the colony.1 However, the researchers did not know if the chemicals were simply a result of the fungal infection or if the sick pupae specifically released them to call for their own demise.

In a new study, Cremer and her colleagues discovered that the infected pupae only released chemicals when there were workers nearby, suggesting that the sick young ants put these events in motion.2 The researchers’ findings, published in Nature Communications, are the first evidence of altruistic disease signaling in a social insects and share similarities with how sick and dying cells send a “find me and eat me” signal to the immune system.3

Continue reading below...

Like this story? Sign up for FREE Immunology updates:

Latest science news storiesTopic-tailored resources and eventsCustomized newsletter content
Subscribe


To identify fungus-infected pupae, worker ants sense chemicals on the surface of pupae known as cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs). They then “unpack” the infected ants from their cocoons and disinfect them by creating a hole in the pupae and spraying poison into the hole. The multi-step behavior prevents the fungal pathogen from producing spores that could infect the rest of the colony. Cremer’s team previously noted that certain CHCs were significantly more abundant on the infected pupae than on their uninfected counterparts. They found that washing the pupae with pentane removed CHCs and reduced workers’ unpacking behavior.

In the present study, Cremer wanted to know what triggered the release of these specific CHCs. To address this, the team compared immune gene activation and CHC profiles between infected pupae in the presence and absence of workers.

Infected pupae consistently upregulated immune genes upon infection, regardless of whether workers were around. However, changes in the level of specific CHCs only occurred when the pupae were infected and workers were nearby. Furthermore, the team found that when they coated healthy pupae with extracts from infected pupae, workers unpacked the healthy pupae more frequently than healthy pupae covered in “non-signal” extracts. Altogether, these observations indicate that infected pupae likely release specific CHCs so workers could find and kill them, which means that these young ants sacrifice themselves to benefit the colony.

However, evolutionarily, this behavior likely benefits the young ants too, said Erika Dawson, a behavioral ecologist and a former postdoctoral researcher at ISTA who led the study. “By warning the colony of their deadly infection, terminally ill ants help the colony remain healthy and produce daughter colonies, which indirectly pass on the signaler’s genes to the next generation.”

  1. Pull CD, et al. Destructive disinfection of infected brood prevents systemic disease spread in ant colonies. Elife. 2018;7:e32073.
  2. Dawson EH, et al. Altruistic disease signalling in ant colonies. Nat Commun. 2025;16:10511.
  3. Kugelberg E. Cell death: Find me and eat me. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(3):131.
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • Image of Andrea Lius.

    Andrea Lius is an intern at The Scientist. She earned her PhD in pharmacology from the University of Washington. Besides science, she also enjoys writing short-form creative nonfiction.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems
Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Covaris
Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Miltenyi
Mapping Clonal Mosaicism in Aging Tissues

Mapping Clonal Mosaicism in Aging Tissues

Mission bio

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo
Conceptual image of ice and frost.

The VAULT100 PRO: Inside the most advanced Stirling Ultracold ULT freezer ever built.

Stirling Ultracold logo