Skip to main content

"Epigenetics" drives phenotype?

Researchers have identified a possible mechanism by which DNA regions that don't encode proteins can still determine phenotypic traits such as a person's height or susceptibility to a particular disease, researchers report online in Science today. Image: WikipediaThe scientists found that certain chromatin modifications often considered to be epigenetic -- meaning, regulated by factors other than genetic sequence -- are in fact determined by a person's DNA. Moreover, they found that this c

Written byAlla Katsnelson
| 3 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00
Researchers have identified a possible mechanism by which DNA regions that don't encode proteins can still determine phenotypic traits such as a person's height or susceptibility to a particular disease, researchers report online in Science today.
Image: Wikipedia
The scientists found that certain chromatin modifications often considered to be epigenetic -- meaning, regulated by factors other than genetic sequence -- are in fact determined by a person's DNA. Moreover, they found that this chromatin variation is associated with distinct single nucleotide polymorphisms, suggesting that the variation may serve as a platform to enable these SNPs -- often found in non-coding regions of DNA -- to influence phenotype. "This is quite novel," said linkurl:Emmanouil Dermitzakis,;https://www.medecine.unige.ch/recherche/groupes/b_donnees/cv_892_4.html a geneticist at the University of Geneva Medical School, who was not involved in the study. "Epigenetics has been used as a term that is orthogonal to genetics. This study clearly shows it's not." Genome-wide association studies have linked single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to particular diseases or characteristics, but how SNPs relate to phenotype has been unclear. Because SNPs often occur in non-coding regions of the genome, researchers have generally thought that what links these regions to phenotype are processes that control how genes are regulated, but such a relationship has never been demonstrated. "What this paper really does is show this to be the case," said linkurl:Vishwanath Iyer;https://www.biosci.utexas.edu/mgm/people/faculty/profiles/iyer.htm of the University of Texas at Austin, one of study's three lead authors. The researchers examined two processes involved in gene regulation: chromatin structure -- in particular, whether or not chromatin is open, allowing genes to be transcribed -- and transcription factor binding. Both of these features can be regulated epigenetically -- that is, by factors such as DNA methylation and histone modifications. They used high-throughput sequencing to analyze cell lines taken from six individuals whose genomes had originally been sequenced within the 1000 Genomes Project -- two parents and their daughter from Utah, of northern and western European ancestry, and two parents and their daughter from Ibadan, Nigeria, of Yoruban ancestry. This pool of six people allowed them to compare these factors across both alleles of genes carried by single individuals, as well as examine familial heritability in the two daughters. "It's the first time someone has looked at chromatin structure throughout the genome in related individuals," Iyer said. In 10 percent of the sites they examined, they found that chromatin sites that tended to be open in the parents also tended to be open in their daughters, suggesting chromatin structure was heritable. Similarly, many differences in transcription factor binding were maintained across individuals. But these differences could still be the result of heritable changes in epigenetics, not genetics. So the authors also looked at these traits at at both alleles in single genes in the individuals' genomes. They found that, in a subset of sites, chromatin structure and transcription factor binding occurred differently at each allele, which suggested it was the genetic code at each allele that produced the difference. "We find that it is actually the sequence that matters," said Iyer. If a non-coding SNP leads to a difference in chromatin structure and/or transcription factor binding, that effect can indeed be inherited, thereby providing a potential mechanism for transmission of phenotypes like disease susceptibility, Iyer said. "What we have is a way to link polymorphisms to phenotypes via things like chromatin structure and transcription factor binding." He stressed that not all forms of chromatin-level regulation were dependent on the genome sequence. "We are looking at one transcription factor and one measure of chromatin structure," he said; other kinds of chromatin variation, however, may be due to mechanisms such as DNA methylation, which are independent of the sequence. "The paper in itself is not really surprising," said linkurl:Maxwell Lee,;https://ccr.cancer.gov/staff/staff.asp?profileid=5543 a geneticist at the National Cancer Institute, but the researchers examined variation at many more loci than previous studies have looked at, and also were able to examine variation both at the level of different chromosomes as well as different individuals. The study was done in the context of the linkurl:ENCODE Consortium,;https://www.genome.gov/10005107 a large-scale project conducted by the National Human Genome Research Institute that aims to understand all the functional elements in the human genome. The next step, said Iyer, is to examine this type of variation in a much larger set of people to determine when it is functional, and exactly how it drives phenotype.
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Epigenetic suicide note;https://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/55843/
[August 2009]*linkurl:Burning chromatin at both ends;https://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/55468/
[March 2009]*linkurl:An epigenetic inheritance;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55342/
[January 19th 2009]
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

Related articles background image
August 2026 Digest cover
August 2026

Epic Fail: Sea-Monkeys Sabotage Fieldwork

When Barry Hicks set out to photograph thrombolites, thousands of unexpected visitors photobombed his underwater images.

View this Issue
Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Overcoming Immunotherapy Resistance in Liver Cancer

Axion Biosystems
Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Optimizing NGS Library Preparation for Reliable Sequencing Data

Covaris
Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Using TCR Repertoire Sequencing to Advance Immunology Research

Miltenyi
Mapping Clonal Mosaicism in Aging Tissues

Mapping Clonal Mosaicism in Aging Tissues

Mission bio

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches SuperNuclease ® Pro with Free Trial Program

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Launches Precisely Characterized Full-Length p-Tau217 Protein to Advance Next-Generation Alzheimer’s Biomarker Assay Development

A photo of a scientist placing the Resipher device on a 96-well plate.

Resipher: Continuous Live-Cell Mitochondrial Respiration Monitoring in 96-Well Plates

Lucid Scientific logo
Conceptual image of ice and frost.

The VAULT100 PRO: Inside the most advanced Stirling Ultracold ULT freezer ever built.

Stirling Ultracold logo