Bailing out life science

Written byBob Grant

| 2 min read

Life sciences will indeed receive a boost in funding in President-Elect Barack Obama's sprawling economic recovery plan, according to figures from the House Appropriations Committee released today. A statement from the committee says that the National Institutes of Health will get $2 billion, the National Science Foundation will receive $3 billion, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will get $462 million. As the 111th Congress squabbled over the finer points of the recovery package, science advocacy and trade organizations voiced their hopes and rallied their membership to ensure that research is not forgotten in the latest efforts to rally the flagging US economy. The figures put forth by the Appropriation Committee fall short of the wish lists put forth by many of these groups. The clearest voice clamoring for increased funding at government life science agencies has come from Research!America. The science advocacy group suggested that an infusion of $11.1 billion would resuscitate agencies such as the NIH, NSF and the CDC. The group sent a linkurl:letter;http://www.researchamerica.org/uploads/economicrecoveryltr.pdf in December to Obama asking that NIH be given an $8.6 billion boost while NSF and CDC get $1.4 billion and $1 billion, respectively. The Society for Neuroscience has assembled a nice little linkurl:fact sheet;http://www.sfn.org/SiteObjects/published/0000BDF20016F63800FD712C30FA42DD/28EBBA026DAA9F18F9FA32A2991D17BE/file/NIH%20economic%20fact%20sheet.pdf on how investing in the NIH can translate directly to economic stimulation. Highlights from that document: "In 2007, NIH grants and contracts created and supported more than 350,000 jobs that generated wages in excess of $18 billion in the 50 states." "Every dollar of NIH funding generated more than twice as much in state economic output: an overall investment of $22.846 billion from NIH generated a total of $50.537 billion in new state business in the form of increased output of goods and services." The Massachusetts Life Sciences Collaborative meanwhile has sought the support of Democratic Senators Edward Kennedy and John Kerry in boosting the NIH budget. By the collaborative's calculations, each NIH grant yields seven new jobs and each NIH dollar spent is worth two in economic impact. Research and development focused on energy and technology is also set to receive a slice of whatever science funding is included in the multi-billion dollar package. New Jersey Democratic Congressman Rush Holt recently said, at a meeting with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), other legislators and prominent scientists, that R&D investments "are not luxuries to be engaged in in plush times, but rather the basis for economic growth [and] economic prosperity." The Appropriation Committee's numbers indicate that the Department of Energy would get $1.9 billion, NASA would get $600 million, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology would get $300 million, under the current plan. Congress is expected to pass the Obama recovery package sometime in February. We'll see how well life science makes out.
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:$500 million NIH funds boost?;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55016/
[17th September 2008]*linkurl:Boost for NSF funding;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54756/
[19th June 2008]

Meet the Author

Bob Grant

From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer. Before joining the team, he worked as a reporter at Audubon and earned a master’s degree in science journalism from New York University. In his previous life, he pursued a career in science, getting a bachelor’s degree in wildlife biology from Montana State University and a master’s degree in marine biology from the College of Charleston in South Carolina. Bob edited Reading Frames and other sections of the magazine.

View Full Profile

Bailing out life science

The Scientist ARCHIVES

Become a Member of

Meet the Author

Bob Grant

Related Research Resources

Why Do We Feel Butterflies in the Stomach?

Research Resources

Podcasts

Webinars

Videos

Infographics

eBooks

Best Practices for Precise Pipetting

Long-Read RNA Sequencing Reveals a Regulatory Role for Splicing in Immunotherapy Responses

Research Roundtable: The Evolving World of Spatial Biology

Exploring the State of the Art in Gene Editing Techniques

Products

Product News

LabVantage Solutions Awarded $22.3 Million U.S Customs and Border Protection Contract to Deliver Next-Generation Forensic LIMS

Evosep Unveils Open Innovation Initiative to Expand Standardization in Proteomics

SPT Labtech and Alithea Genomics Collaborate to Automate Ultra Sensitive Single-Cell Transcriptomic Workflows

OGT expands MRD detection capabilities with new SureSeq Myeloid MRD Plus NGS Panel