Birds of a feather

In the largest ever study of bird genetics, a five-year international collaboration has redrawn the avian family tree. The report, published in Science this week (June 27), proposes surprising new classifications and suggests that environmental adaptations arose multiple times in bird history. "It's an important paper that represents a very comprehensive study," said linkurl:Larry Martin,;http://www.nhm.ku.edu/paleontology/ldmartin.htm Curator of the National History Museum at the University

Written byMegan Scudellari
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
In the largest ever study of bird genetics, a five-year international collaboration has redrawn the avian family tree. The report, published in Science this week (June 27), proposes surprising new classifications and suggests that environmental adaptations arose multiple times in bird history. "It's an important paper that represents a very comprehensive study," said linkurl:Larry Martin,;http://www.nhm.ku.edu/paleontology/ldmartin.htm Curator of the National History Museum at the University of Kansas, who was not involved in the research. A reliable avian family tree has remained elusive due to birds' reputed explosive divergence 150 million years ago. Competing morphologic, cladistic, and genomic studies have presented conflicting results, Martin noted. The new classification means "you pretty well have to re-do everything," he said. "But that's not necessarily a bad thing. It's nice to get something reasonably stable." For their phylogeny, linkurl:Shannon Hackett,;http://fm1.fieldmuseum.org/aa/staff_page.cgi?staff=hackett head of the Division of Birds at the linkurl:Field Museum;http://www.fieldmuseum.org/ in Chicago, and colleagues collected specimens from around the world, then sequenced and analyzed their DNA across multiple chromosomes. The results challenge a major 2004 linkurl:study;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15068356?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum that concluded the avian evolutionary tree was nothing more than a bush, an irresolvable mass of "extremely short (in some cases zero-length) branches" resulting from simultaneous radiation of multiple families. But, said Hackett, it is possible to recover early relationships. "It's time to look at birds in a new way," she remarked. According to Hackett, the study differs from previous attempts to fill out the avian family tree by its scale of data gathering and sample choices. The team collected 32 kb of data from 169 bird species in order to map out 19 nuclear loci on 15 chromosomes. When selecting species to include, the team did not use traditional taxonomy, but rather the results of a 1990 DNA hybridization linkurl:study;http://yalepress.yale.edu/book.asp?isbn=9780300040852 that estimated relatedness based on DNA similarity. Hackett's team chose large quantities of species within particular families in a deliberate attempt to sample deep lineages. More than any previous study, Martin pointed out, it demonstrates that adaptations in birds have evolved multiple times. The water-loving flamingo, for example, is not closely related to most other aquatic birds. Similarly, several lifestyle niches evolved more than once: bright, daytime hummingbirds evolved from dull, nocturnal nightjars. But as surprising as it is, the data fits the basic pattern of evolution, Martin said. "A normal pattern in evolution is for adaptive similarity to evolve multiple times in similar groups because of natural selection for particular ecologies." The results may be controversial to some, Hackett admits. But she hopes that for others it will shed new light on current work as well as stimulate new research. "I think we've provided people with roots, a good trunk, and big branches," Hackett concluded. "Now they can leaf it out more effectively than they could in the past."
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

Share
Image of a man in a laboratory looking frustrated with his failed experiment.
February 2026

A Stubborn Gene, a Failed Experiment, and a New Path

When experiments refuse to cooperate, you try again and again. For Rafael Najmanovich, the setbacks ultimately pushed him in a new direction.

View this Issue
Human-Relevant In Vitro Models Enable Predictive Drug Discovery

Advancing Drug Discovery with Complex Human In Vitro Models

Stemcell Technologies
Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Beckman Coulter logo
Conceptual multicolored vector image of cancer research, depicting various biomedical approaches to cancer therapy

Maximizing Cancer Research Model Systems

bioxcell

Products

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Pioneers Life Sciences Innovation with High-Quality Bioreagents on Inside Business Today with Bill and Guiliana Rancic

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological Expands Research Reagent Portfolio to Support Global Nipah Virus Vaccine and Diagnostic Development

Beckman Coulter

Beckman Coulter Life Sciences Partners with Automata to Accelerate AI-Ready Laboratory Automation

Refeyn logo

Refeyn named in the Sunday Times 100 Tech list of the UK’s fastest-growing technology companies