Changes to federal biotech grants?

The linkurl:House Committee on Small Business;http://www.house.gov/smbiz/ is calling on legislators to overhaul the federal Small Business Innovation Research linkurl:(SBIR);http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/15805/ program, which awarded more than $2 billion last year to biotech and other start-ups with promising and salable ideas or technologies. The committee is crafting legislation to reauthorize the SBIR program, which is managed by the US Small Business Administration (SBA) and i

Written byBob Grant
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
The linkurl:House Committee on Small Business;http://www.house.gov/smbiz/ is calling on legislators to overhaul the federal Small Business Innovation Research linkurl:(SBIR);http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/15805/ program, which awarded more than $2 billion last year to biotech and other start-ups with promising and salable ideas or technologies. The committee is crafting legislation to reauthorize the SBIR program, which is managed by the US Small Business Administration (SBA) and is due to sunset at the end of September. The SBIR program - which was created in 1982 and to date has awarded more than $12 billion in grants for early-stage research at small businesses - is successful, Edsel Brown, assistant director of SBA's Office of Technology, told __The Scientist__. But the program does need some improvements, Brown said. "We really do need to look at [the SBIR program] and make it as good as it can be and fine tune it." Eleven federal agencies, including Health and Human Services and the National Science Foundation, participate in the SBIR program, and participating agencies must devote at least 2.5 percent of their extramural research budgets towards SBIR grants. According to Committee Chairwoman linkurl:Nydia Velazquez;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AclTmqqO0KE&feature=PlayList&p=2E3898CEE2253A32&index=0 (D-NY), there are several problems with the SBIR program as it now stands: SBIR awards are not hefty enough to support modern-day research and development, the SBIR program makes too many companies ineligible for SBIR money because they are supported by venture capital, and the SBIR program is not placing enough of an emphasis on the commercialization of the technologies it supports. The committee's legislation suggests attracting more companies to the program by doubling SBIR award amounts - from $100,000 to $200,000 for phase I SBIR awards and from $750,000 to $1,500,000 for phase II awards. It also suggests redefining "small business" to include companies in which more than 50 percent of stock is held by venture capital investors. Under current rules, some companies with this much venture capital investment are not eligible to receive SBIR awards, and the SBA wants to keep this limitation. Jim Greenwood, CEO of the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), linkurl:commended;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2dU7Tb_Gis&feature=PlayList&p=2E3898CEE2253A32&index=6 the committee for its "insight in including a remedy to the eligibility issues affecting many small life sciences companies in the reauthorization legislation soon to be introduced," he said. "It is the right thing to do, and this is the right time to do it." Greenwood added that SBIR applications received by NIH have dramatically decreased in recent years. "The number of new businesses applying is at the lowest level it has been in a decade," he said. A spokesperson for the House Committee on Small Business wrote in an Email to __The Scientist__ that the committee "expects the bill to make it to the floor before the September 30th deadline," but could not give a more exact timeline.
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer. Before joining the team, he worked as a reporter at Audubon and earned a master’s degree in science journalism from New York University. In his previous life, he pursued a career in science, getting a bachelor’s degree in wildlife biology from Montana State University and a master’s degree in marine biology from the College of Charleston in South Carolina. Bob edited Reading Frames and other sections of the magazine.

    View Full Profile
Share
Image of a woman with her hands across her stomach. She has a look of discomfort on her face. There is a blown up image of her stomach next to her and it has colorful butterflies and gut bacteria all swarming within the gut.
November 2025, Issue 1

Why Do We Feel Butterflies in the Stomach?

These fluttering sensations are the brain’s reaction to certain emotions, which can be amplified or soothed by the gut’s own “bugs".

View this Issue
Olga Anczukow and Ryan Englander discuss how transcriptome splicing affects immune system function in lung cancer.

Long-Read RNA Sequencing Reveals a Regulatory Role for Splicing in Immunotherapy Responses

Pacific Biosciences logo
Research Roundtable: The Evolving World of Spatial Biology

Research Roundtable: The Evolving World of Spatial Biology

Conceptual cartoon image of gene editing technology

Exploring the State of the Art in Gene Editing Techniques

Bio-Rad
Conceptual image of a doctor holding a brain puzzle, representing Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.

Simplifying Early Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis with Blood Testing

fujirebio logo

Products

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Evosep Unveils Open Innovation Initiative to Expand Standardization in Proteomics

OGT logo

OGT expands MRD detection capabilities with new SureSeq Myeloid MRD Plus NGS Panel

Eppendorf Logo

Research on rewiring neural circuit in fruit flies wins 2025 Eppendorf & Science Prize