Clinical diagnostics in a Starbucks package

The __New York Times__ linkurl:has an interesting business story;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/13/business/13diagnose.html on the growth of high-priced clinical diagnostic tests involving genomic and proteomic technologies. One chief scientific officer praised the makers of Oncotype DX (which rates the risk of breast cancer recurrence based on a panel of 12 genes) for validating their product in the clinic and then placing it ?in a Starbucks package at a high price.? At $3500 a pop, the test

| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
The __New York Times__ linkurl:has an interesting business story;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/13/business/13diagnose.html on the growth of high-priced clinical diagnostic tests involving genomic and proteomic technologies. One chief scientific officer praised the makers of Oncotype DX (which rates the risk of breast cancer recurrence based on a panel of 12 genes) for validating their product in the clinic and then placing it ?in a Starbucks package at a high price.? At $3500 a pop, the test apparently appeals to a more exclusive club of health consumer. Even the name DX speaks to me of leather seats, wood paneling, and a temperature controlled cup holder for your latte. I was a tad surprised that this type of testing has moved so quickly to what another chief executive referred to as ??pharmaceutical-like? profit margins? (although it should be noted, that description was touted at an investor?s meeting). But how could the market be so hot for products that haven?t had a huge amount of testing yet? Well, the article does note that such tests currently don?t require FDA approval and that the companies producing them have largely kept testing proprietary ? essentially a mail order business restricted to the labs where they were developed, a situation that some critics say may make improvements in the methods less likely. The FDA has declared some intention to regulate the field. The article mentions Correlogic, makers of the embattled Ovacheck, a serum proteomic test for ovarian cancer. Several articles (which we?ll be covering in our May Hot Papers section) pointed to irreproducibility of initial results. The FDA sent a letter, and Ovacheck has yet to make it to market. As the power and promise of pharmacogenetics increases in the next several years, we?ll likely see this issue come up more and more frequently. But whether regulation will be the norm, forcing such tests to prove their worth over existing tests for the same conditions, is still a matter of speculation. Anyone willing to bet a cup of coffee on it?
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Brendan Maher

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
TS Digest January 2025
January 2025, Issue 1

Why Do Some People Get Drunk Faster Than Others?

Genetics and tolerance shake up how alcohol affects each person, creating a unique cocktail of experiences.

View this Issue
Sex Differences in Neurological Research

Sex Differences in Neurological Research

bit.bio logo
New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

New Frontiers in Vaccine Development

Sino
New Approaches for Decoding Cancer at the Single-Cell Level

New Approaches for Decoding Cancer at the Single-Cell Level

Biotium logo
Learn How 3D Cell Cultures Advance Tissue Regeneration

Organoids as a Tool for Tissue Regeneration Research 

Acro 

Products

Artificial Inc. Logo

Artificial Inc. proof-of-concept data demonstrates platform capabilities with NVIDIA’s BioNeMo

Sapient Logo

Sapient Partners with Alamar Biosciences to Extend Targeted Proteomics Services Using NULISA™ Assays for Cytokines, Chemokines, and Inflammatory Mediators

Bio-Rad Logo

Bio-Rad Extends Range of Vericheck ddPCR Empty-Full Capsid Kits to Optimize AAV Vector Characterization

Scientist holding a blood sample tube labeled Mycoplasma test in front of many other tubes containing patient samples

Accelerating Mycoplasma Testing for Targeted Therapy Development