Dire stats for biotech

The Biotech Industry Organization (BIO) this morning released a set of statistics that give a rather dire snapshot of the industry's health. Here are some of the highlights -- or, should I say, lowlights -- straight from their roundup: Image: linkurl:flicker:Kaibara87;http://www.flickr.com/photos/kaibara/ - 120 companies (30%) are now trading with less than 6 months of cash on hand. This represents a jump of 90% over the number of companies with less than 6 months cash on hand in 2007. (source

| 1 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Share
The Biotech Industry Organization (BIO) this morning released a set of statistics that give a rather dire snapshot of the industry's health. Here are some of the highlights -- or, should I say, lowlights -- straight from their roundup:
Image: linkurl:flicker:Kaibara87;http://www.flickr.com/photos/kaibara/
- 120 companies (30%) are now trading with less than 6 months of cash on hand. This represents a jump of 90% over the number of companies with less than 6 months cash on hand in 2007. (source: BIO) - 180 companies (45%) have less than 1 year of cash remaining. This represents a 65% jump vs. 2007. (source: BIO) - Only 10% of the 370 public US biotech companies have positive income [cash flow].(source: BIO) - By comparison with 2007, funds raised from initial public offerings in 2008 fell 97% and follow-on/secondary offerings [a second round of stock issuance after an IPO] fell 56%. Total capital raised by the industry in 2008 fell by 55% vs. 2007. (source: BioCentury). - In 2006, 32 life sciences companies raised $1.7 billion through IPOs. In 2007, 41 raised $1.9 billion. In 2008, there was only one IPO in the US, which raised $5.8 million. (source: BioWorld) - 87% of US biotech stocks lost value in 2008. - More than 80 companies laid off more than 5,000 employees in 2008, and 34 biotech companies have laid-off 10% or more of their workforce since September, 2008. (source: BioWorld, BIO)
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:How to save biotech;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/55425/
[17th February 2009]*linkurl:Sluggish economy hits biotech;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54816/
[2nd July 2008]*linkurl:The birth of biotech;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/53918/
[December 2007]
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Alla Katsnelson

    This person does not yet have a bio.
Share
May digest 2025 cover
May 2025, Issue 1

Study Confirms Safety of Genetically Modified T Cells

A long-term study of nearly 800 patients demonstrated a strong safety profile for T cells engineered with viral vectors.

View this Issue
iStock

TaqMan Probe & Assays: Unveil What's Possible Together

Thermo Fisher Logo
Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Meet Aunty and Tackle Protein Stability Questions in Research and Development

Unchained Labs
Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Detecting Residual Cell Line-Derived DNA with Droplet Digital PCR

Bio-Rad
How technology makes PCR instruments easier to use.

Making Real-Time PCR More Straightforward

Thermo Fisher Logo

Products

fujirebio-square-logo

Fujirebio Receives Marketing Clearance for Lumipulse® G pTau 217/ β-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio In-Vitro Diagnostic Test

The Scientist Placeholder Image

Biotium Launches New Phalloidin Conjugates with Extended F-actin Staining Stability for Greater Imaging Flexibility

Leica Microsystems Logo

Latest AI software simplifies image analysis and speeds up insights for scientists

BioSkryb Genomics Logo

BioSkryb Genomics and Tecan introduce a single-cell multiomics workflow for sequencing-ready libraries in under ten hours