DNA repair causes damage

A DNA repair mechanism may come at a cost -- cancer-causing mutations, according to a study published this week in Science. DNA ligase repairs chromosomal damageImage: Wikimedia commons, TomEllenberger WashingtonUniversity School of MedicineA supposedly accurate DNA repair mechanism employed by cells to fix double-strand breaks can surprisingly increase the nearby mutation rate by up to 1400 times, providing a possible explanation for the accumulation of tumor-causing mutations in cancerous tis

Written byJef Akst
| 3 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00
Share
A DNA repair mechanism may come at a cost -- cancer-causing mutations, according to a study published this week in Science.
DNA ligase repairs chromosomal damage
Image: Wikimedia commons, Tom
Ellenberger Washington
University School of Medicine
A supposedly accurate DNA repair mechanism employed by cells to fix double-strand breaks can surprisingly increase the nearby mutation rate by up to 1400 times, providing a possible explanation for the accumulation of tumor-causing mutations in cancerous tissues. Previously, "we saw that DNA breaks are present in precancerous legions," said molecular oncologist linkurl:Thanos Halazonetis;http://www.molbio.unige.ch/halazonetis/ of the University of Geneva, who did not participate in the research. "These breaks, based on this finding now, could perhaps explain [some of the] mutations in oncogenes that drive cancer progression." Cancer cells are the subject of unusually high numbers of mutations, but for many cancers, the cause of those mutations is unknown. Chromosomes are commonly rearranged in precancerous tissues, a result of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the DNA. But how the breaks lead to these mutations has been "a longstanding mystery," said geneticist linkurl:Dmitry Gordenin;http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/atniehs/labs/lmg/cs/staff.cfm of the Laboratory of Molecular Genetics at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, who was also not involved in the study. To see how these two events were related, linkurl:James Haber;http://www.bio.brandeis.edu/faculty/haber.html of Brandeis University in Massachusetts and his colleagues induced DSBs in a specific location in the yeast genome, and measured the resulting mutation rate surrounding that locus. They found that the mutation rate indeed increased -- up to 1400 times more than the normal spontaneous mutation rate would predict -- and it was the cells' attempts to repair the damage that was responsible. "Even though the repair process is designed to be very accurate," Haber said, "it turns out that it comes at the cost -- a high rate of mutation associated with the event." But what was most surprising, researchers say, was the repair mechanism that was messing everything up -- the usually accurate process of homologous recombination, in which DNA polymerase uses a sister chromatid or homologous chromosome as a template for re-synthesizing the missing DNA. While the DNA polymerases commonly involved in mismatch repair are known to cause relatively frequent errors, the DNA polymerases involved in recombination are the same as those that are responsible for normal DNA replication, which were "assumed to be very accurate," said molecular oncologist linkurl:Lawrence Loeb;http://depts.washington.edu/mcb/faculty_profile.php?fcid=96 of the University of Washington, who was not involved in the research. "People usually thought that the process of recombination would be error-free, and here [they have] shown it can be highly error-prone." In addition to point mutations, where an incorrect nucleotide is inserted into the DNA sequence, the researchers also observed more dramatic alterations called frameshift mutations in the area of the DSB. These mutations occur when the DNA polymerase that is re-synthesizing the missing code slips off the homologous sequence it is reading and reattaches somewhere else, either on the same chromosome or a different one entirely. "These [types of mutations] involve incredible instability of the copying process," Haber said. "[The polymerase] is not holding on to the template; it gets partway across and falls off." When this happens, "the other bit of homology doesn't fully align, [and] the switch itself causes error," added Loeb. Once detached, the polymerases could even reattach to the strands of DNA they had just constructed, folding back on themselves to create a little "hairpin." These hairpin mutations are particularly interesting with regard to their implications for cancer, Haber noted, as such mutations can be found in the human p53 mutation database. "These odd hairpin-like mutations are not just a yeast thing; they're apparently frequently found in human cancers," he said. Of course, before this mechanism can be assumed to apply to human cancers, "one would have to validate or repeat this study with human cells," Halazonetis said. "But because homologous recombination is conserved in yeast and human cells, I would think that this probably would be true in human cells." Consequently, "these breaks may explain a fraction of the mutations in human cancers." W.M. Hicks, et al., "Increased mutagenesis and unique mutation signature associated wit mitotic gene conversion," Science, 329:82-5, 2010.
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Ancient microbes repair DNA;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/53546/
[27th August 2007]*linkurl:DNA repair mapped, systems-wide;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23466/
[19th May 2006]*linkurl:DNA Damage Responses: Cancer and Beyond;http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/15766/
[10th October 2005]
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • Jef (an unusual nickname for Jennifer) got her master’s degree from Indiana University in April 2009 studying the mating behavior of seahorses. After four years of diving off the Gulf Coast of Tampa and performing behavioral experiments at the Tennessee Aquarium in Chattanooga, she left research to pursue a career in science writing. As The Scientist's managing editor, Jef edited features and oversaw the production of the TS Digest and quarterly print magazine. In 2022, her feature on uterus transplantation earned first place in the trade category of the Awards for Excellence in Health Care Journalism. She is a member of the National Association of Science Writers.

    View Full Profile
Share
Illustration of a developing fetus surrounded by a clear fluid with a subtle yellow tinge, representing amniotic fluid.
January 2026

What Is the Amniotic Fluid Composed of?

The liquid world of fetal development provides a rich source of nutrition and protection tailored to meet the needs of the growing fetus.

View this Issue
Human-Relevant In Vitro Models Enable Predictive Drug Discovery

Advancing Drug Discovery with Complex Human In Vitro Models

Stemcell Technologies
Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Redefining Immunology Through Advanced Technologies

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in AAV Manufacturing with Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Beckman Coulter Logo
Conceptual multicolored vector image of cancer research, depicting various biomedical approaches to cancer therapy

Maximizing Cancer Research Model Systems

bioxcell

Products

Refeyn logo

Refeyn named in the Sunday Times 100 Tech list of the UK’s fastest-growing technology companies

Parse Logo

Parse Biosciences and Graph Therapeutics Partner to Build Large Functional Immune Perturbation Atlas

Sino Biological Logo

Sino Biological's Launch of SwiftFluo® TR-FRET Kits Pioneers a New Era in High-Throughout Kinase Inhibitor Screening

SPT Labtech Logo

SPT Labtech enables automated Twist Bioscience NGS library preparation workflows on SPT's firefly platform